Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > GOVERNMENT & ADMINISTRATIVE LAW > Social Security Disability / SSI Law

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-14-2009, 05:14 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: san fransisco bay area
Posts: 3

time limitations on applying for ssd


What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? ca
for numerous reasons, along with fact did not need the $ enough to place us/wife through hassles we didn't apply till recently. She was granted ssdi, denied ssd because no evidence submitted to back up claim as to when and extent of initial diagnossis. There was no mention of too much time passed since happened to file now. I believe we can easily prove year of onset, and with documented examples of behavior, police reports etc we can show inability for meaningful employment. however doctor during time involved long since ret and deceased. are there alternatives to Doctors statements regards ability to work. This is further complicated by an inheritance i am/have recieved which will disqualify her from ssdi. wife diagnosed paranoid schiz What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)?
  #2  
Old 08-14-2009, 09:46 PM
BL BL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In the good old US of A
Posts: 13,793
Quote:
Originally Posted by lostsouls View Post
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? ca
for numerous reasons, along with fact did not need the $ enough to place us/wife through hassles we didn't apply till recently. She was granted ssdi, denied ssd because no evidence submitted to back up claim as to when and extent of initial diagnossis. There was no mention of too much time passed since happened to file now. I believe we can easily prove year of onset, and with documented examples of behavior, police reports etc we can show inability for meaningful employment. however doctor during time involved long since ret and deceased. are there alternatives to Doctors statements regards ability to work. This is further complicated by an inheritance i am/have recieved which will disqualify her from ssdi. wife diagnosed paranoid schiz What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)?
You must understand SSDI is based on ones work history and has nothing to do with your inheritances .

Secondly , if she has recently been DX's with the disease mentioned ,she'd defiantly qualify .

If you are saying the DX records have been lost , she may have to be DX's again .

You say one Dr. is deceased .What about the mental health agency's records ?

You might want to take your wife to a free consult with an SSI Attorney , and hire them on a contingency basis , if they take on the case .
__________________
By M : be careful and avoid entering any personal information into your reply (or in your "signature" that is included at the bottom of any message you write). Do not have the sig files contain your name, address, or any other identifying information. Though I must say, some of you have turned them into a minor art forum (i.e., witticisms, sayings, graphics, and so forth).
  #3  
Old 08-16-2009, 04:00 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: san fransisco bay area
Posts: 3

thank you for response


i guess still not clear on this. The one she was granted assets will disqualify her. The one denied which would be based on her work history they agree she was insured during the time diagnosed however the degree and time of onset is basis for denial. This was 88. I have some paperwork from 91 which does refer to illness, and when diagnosed, however does not address inability to work. This is from doctor now deceased. She has been on meds since that time, with a year or so when non med compliant. The only reason my inheritance comes in is, if need be in order to ensure still qualifies for something if allowed i will place in irrevocable special needs trust. Especially as it is starting to appear that i should have tried to get her on disability years ago. I just didn't see need . However she was covered at time of diagnosis, and it was severe for 2+years at time and obviously as they acknowledge condition now has lasted for more than 12months.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.