Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > TRAFFIC LAW > Speeding and Other Moving Violations

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-21-2005, 02:42 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 7
Cool

CALIF - Wrong Violation On Ticket


What is the name of your state?What is the name of your state? California
I received a citation for going 75 in a 65. The officer wrote 22347(a). I checked the CA VC online and that section does not exist. I found 22349(a) and that DOES relate to my offense. Should I contest the citation? Should I wait until I go to court? Should I inform the judge then and there or wait until the case goes to trial? Any suggestions would be of help.
Thanks in advance!
    Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-21-2005, 03:04 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 160
Take a look at this thread.

[url]http://forum.freeadvice.com/showthread.php?t=234766[/url]

Hope this helps.
__________________
My state: PA
I am not an officer of the court. All responses are based on my personal experience and/or research of other sources.
"Look: here's the thing about law and technicalities. Law is a technical discipline. Like any science, it is a body of doctrine that is technical..." - Jeremy Waldron, Professor of Law
"Chance favors the prepared mind" - Louis Pastuer
    Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-21-2005, 03:10 PM
seniorjudge
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by loulblades
Take a look at this thread.

[url]http://forum.freeadvice.com/showthread.php?t=234766[/url]

Hope this helps.
That is a good thread....
    Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-22-2005, 10:40 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 7
Question

CALIF - Wrong Violation On Ticket


I'm In California:
Thanks to loublades and seniorjudge for replying to my post . My wife posed a possible scenario:
The violation number written on my copy may say 22347(a), but the original copy may have the correct number, 22349(a). It was written in triplicate. The "9"s in other places on the citation are plainly written and obvious, but this "9" looks more like a "7". I've asked several members of my family to tell me what the violation number is and they all say it's 22347(a). Would my position that I was not able to prepare a proper defense based on a non-existing law be thrown out becase the officer's copy is correct and mine isn't?
Thanks in advance.
Mike
    Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-22-2005, 10:41 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 7
Question

CALIF - Wrong Violation On Ticket


I'm In California:
Thanks to loulblades and seniorjudge for replying to my post . My wife posed a possible scenario:
The violation number written on my copy may say 22347(a), but the original copy may have the correct number, 22349(a). It was written in triplicate. The "9"s in other places on the citation are plainly written and obvious, but this "9" looks more like a "7". I've asked several members of my family to tell me what the violation number is and they all say it's 22347(a). Would my position that I was not able to prepare a proper defense based on a non-existing law be thrown out becase the officer's copy is correct and mine isn't?
Thanks in advance.
Mike
    Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-22-2005, 11:03 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: California
Posts: 18,460
Send a message via AIM to CdwJava Send a message via Yahoo to CdwJava
Chances are you will soon get a notice in the mail and that notice will have the correct violation. Plus, at your initial court date - the arraignment - they will present the charges to you and ask for a guilty/no guilty plea. If you plead not guilty then a date for trial will likely be set. At that time you will know the specific section. You can try making the argument that you could not enter a proper plea as the section was illegible and thus you were unable to make an informed decision regarding your plea, but chances are this will only delay the inevitable court date.

Unless they somehow skip arraignment and go straight to trial, you may not have a good chance to make the argument that you were unable to prepare a defense due to the charge appearing incorrect on your copy of the citation. This is also why I specifically explain each violation and the tell the person the court date when I cite them.

- Carl
__________________
A Nor Cal Cop Sergeant

"Make mine a double mocha ...
And a croissant!"

He Who Kneels Before God
Can Stand Before Anyone

....author unknown
    Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-22-2005, 03:32 PM
seniorjudge
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by CdwJava
Chances are you will soon get a notice in the mail and that notice will have the correct violation. Plus, at your initial court date - the arraignment - they will present the charges to you and ask for a guilty/no guilty plea. If you plead not guilty then a date for trial will likely be set. At that time you will know the specific section. You can try making the argument that you could not enter a proper plea as the section was illegible and thus you were unable to make an informed decision regarding your plea, but chances are this will only delay the inevitable court date.

Unless they somehow skip arraignment and go straight to trial, you may not have a good chance to make the argument that you were unable to prepare a defense due to the charge appearing incorrect on your copy of the citation. This is also why I specifically explain each violation and the tell the person the court date when I cite them.

- Carl
Agreed...the point being that the copy of the ticket at the courthouse or the traffic violations bureau or wherever is the official document. You do not have an official document. You have an informational copy only.

To make sure go to wherever the ticket is filed and ask to look at it.
    Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-22-2005, 07:35 PM
NotACopOrLawyer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Go to library, borrow Fight Your Ticket, by David Brown.

I am also going to take this opportunity to ask you and all other CA motorists, to call your state senator or assemblyperson and ask them to vote against SB 57, which will add 40% to the fine on tickets. More details are available on the Action page of Highwayrobbery.net , the website about red light camera tickets.


NACOL
    Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-24-2005, 09:39 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 41

Yes


Make sure you look at the original ticket. If it is the wrong section written on the original filed ticket, then yes, it is grounds for dismissal. Although, I would get a lawer. BUT, keep your mouth shut about it, dont tell anyone about your defense. If you do, heres what could happen....the cop will make a motion to amend the citation before the testimony even begins, which means, he will correct the info on the ticket. Then, you are for all intents and purposes screwed.
    Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:05 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.