finedesignz
Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)?
Live in California, but cited in Oregon
Oregon #811.100 "Violation of basic speed rule; penalty"
Although I live in California, I was driving south in Oregon on I-5 when I was pulled over by an Oregon Deputy for going 73 in a 55 mph zone with Laser at 1,240 feet. The officer stated that I was traveling 73 mph he was giving me a citation and recording our conversation.
I explained that I had seen him sitting alongside the road long way off, but was following two other Oregon plated vehicles, keeping with the flow of traffic and the last sign I personally saw said 65mph. I disagreed with his 73 mph claim, because my cruise control was set well under 70 mph. (I only allow myself to travel less than 5 mph over the limit). He said his laser is accurate, they put a tiny dot on the license plate or on the headlight.
When he came back, I asked him why he selected me out of three vehicles and if it was because I was the only one with California plates. He did not deny the fact, but stated that they were going 67 mph (likely accurate, as all three of us had been traveling the same speed for quite some time). He stammered around a bit, and said "they try to pull them all over if they can, but he chose me early on because I was going faster than the other cars." (Obviously not true).
He ended up citing me for going 70 mph, not 73 mph.
I feel the officer was discriminating because it's a well-known fact that Oregonians dislike California drivers.
Any advice you can offer is much appreciated. I would prefer to contest it in writing, so I don't have to personally travel back to Oregon court. But if I lose, I don't have the option of traffic school.
Live in California, but cited in Oregon
Oregon #811.100 "Violation of basic speed rule; penalty"
Although I live in California, I was driving south in Oregon on I-5 when I was pulled over by an Oregon Deputy for going 73 in a 55 mph zone with Laser at 1,240 feet. The officer stated that I was traveling 73 mph he was giving me a citation and recording our conversation.
I explained that I had seen him sitting alongside the road long way off, but was following two other Oregon plated vehicles, keeping with the flow of traffic and the last sign I personally saw said 65mph. I disagreed with his 73 mph claim, because my cruise control was set well under 70 mph. (I only allow myself to travel less than 5 mph over the limit). He said his laser is accurate, they put a tiny dot on the license plate or on the headlight.
When he came back, I asked him why he selected me out of three vehicles and if it was because I was the only one with California plates. He did not deny the fact, but stated that they were going 67 mph (likely accurate, as all three of us had been traveling the same speed for quite some time). He stammered around a bit, and said "they try to pull them all over if they can, but he chose me early on because I was going faster than the other cars." (Obviously not true).
He ended up citing me for going 70 mph, not 73 mph.
I feel the officer was discriminating because it's a well-known fact that Oregonians dislike California drivers.
Any advice you can offer is much appreciated. I would prefer to contest it in writing, so I don't have to personally travel back to Oregon court. But if I lose, I don't have the option of traffic school.