Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > TRAFFIC LAW > Speeding and Other Moving Violations

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-09-2009, 07:03 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2

Cant afford this ticket in this economy


I received a speeding ticket in Pa. by the enrad system. I have two questions. I was clocked by one officer and the info was forwarded to another who wrote the ticket. I have always thought that the officer who sees the violation is the one who has to write the ticket. True or false? Secondly they set the system up near their township border and were writing all the tickets in the adjacent township. Legal?
    Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-09-2009, 08:40 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Missouri Ozarks
Posts: 2,923
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackxx View Post
I received a speeding ticket in Pa. by the enrad system. I have two questions. I was clocked by one officer and the info was forwarded to another who wrote the ticket. I have always thought that the officer who sees the violation is the one who has to write the ticket. True or false? Secondly they set the system up near their township border and were writing all the tickets in the adjacent township. Legal?
If you can't afford a ticket in this economy, slow down--no more tickets and you will get better gas mileage, thus saving you double the money.

Aside from that moral advice, the facts as described sound legal.
    Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-10-2009, 04:23 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Back in LA LA land
Posts: 1,686
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackxx View Post
I have always thought that the officer who sees the violation is the one who has to write the ticket. True or false?
False…
The only issue with a citation that was issued after a joint effort by two police officers is that if only one officer were to appear in court, he could not testify as to what the other officer saw/witnessed/did; that would be considered hearsay. And hearsay is inadmissible and that will cause the prosecutions case to fall apart.
Easy solution though: Why not have both officers show up in court, both officers testify, each to what he saw/witnessed/did… If in fact this was part of an operation that was conducted over a couple hours or longer, they court might even schedule all if not most of those cited drivers who may choose to take their case to trial to appear on the same date or over two consecutive dates making it easy for both officers to be there to offer a complete story against the cited driver.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jackxx View Post
Secondly they set the system up near their township border and were writing all the tickets in the adjacent township. Legal?
Perfectly legal!
Adjacent town, cities even counties will typically have mutual agreements that allow law enforcement agencies from a neighboring town, city, county run across said border for an enforcement stop (that way they don't have to give up on a pursuit) or an operation similar to this. It usually benefits both jurisdictions in the same way.
__________________
"Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security” ~ Benjamin Franklin
    Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-10-2009, 06:37 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozark_Sophist View Post
If you can't afford a ticket in this economy, slow down--no more tickets and you will get better gas mileage, thus saving you double the money.

Aside from that moral advice, the facts as described sound legal.
Thanks for the response. The speed limit is 25 mph on the way down a hill that you would be doing 45 mph if you were not standing on your break. Then you must go back up the hill on the other side. Although your advice in fuel economy has merit in this situation it is completely the opposite.
    Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-10-2009, 08:48 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Back in LA LA land
Posts: 1,686
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackxx View Post
... The speed limit is 25 mph on the way down a hill that you would be doing 45 mph if you were not standing on your break....
See that's where you're going about it the wrong way!

It doesn't matter whether you're standing or sitting on your break.

As for your speed while you drive down the hill, if you would step on your brake pedal accordingly, then you might not double the speed limit!!!
__________________
"Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security” ~ Benjamin Franklin
    Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-10-2009, 10:15 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 674
Here is information about ENRAD

[url=http://www.radardetector.net/forums/speed-trap-info/19422-what-enradd-how-beat.html]What is the ENRADD and how to beat it. - Radar Detector Jammer Forum[/url]

It is a long post, but there are a few possible defenses against ENRAD, look near the end page 8 and beyond. It is not a perfect system as they would like people to believe it has faults which can cause higher speeds then actual.

Next, you were involved in the multi-officer operation so both have to show at the court. Local towns generally do not have both show since they do not want to spend the money either since the town only makes $12.50 for each ticket the rest of your money goes to the court and the PA CAT fund. So they tend to only send the one who wrote the ticket, not the one who actually observed the violation, without that person the state can not win if you know what you are doing.

Most likely, if you show up they will offer you a no points ticket if you agree to plead guilty and pay the fine.
__________________
I am not a lawyer nor am I in law enforcement,

I will not make any value judgment on why you're asking a questions.

I will try to provide information so you can make an informed decisions so take it for what is worth and do your own research.

Remember it is easy to tell someone they will lose verse providing knowledge.

Lastly, I have no vested interest in your outcome win, lose or draw and the same goes for anyone else.
    Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.