Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > TRAFFIC LAW > Speeding and Other Moving Violations

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-26-2008, 09:40 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 94

Court Fees,,,


What is the name of your state? FL
Whats with court fees anyways?? What are they for?
    Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-27-2008, 01:20 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 386
Arrow

Is this the information you're looking for?


4-27-08

Although Court costs aren't referred to as a tax they are for all practical purposes a tax paid by the driver who pleads or is found guilty of a traffic violation.

The costs (or a part of them) of maintaining a court building ,new court facilities and other exspenses are shifted from useing funds collected from other tax sources such as property taxes to drivers who plead or are found guilty of a traffic violation.

As posted on this forum assessments added onto traffic ticket fines in CA. are about 270% x the fine itself... #8314 (Post Reply #2)
In Ca.money from penalty assessments goes to a peace officer's training fund, a correction training fund, jail construction and courthouse construction funds in each county according to a book on fighting traffic tickets in Ca.

I found one site that referred to an increase in court costs paid by traffic violations as increasing the amount availble for building court facilities in Florida.I found a fine schedule and added court costs for traffic violations but from your reference to court costs it appears you already know what those are.

Unfortunately court costs and assessments can be increased periodically.
In my opinion they never should have been added to traffic ticket fines and should be removed.

Keep us posted on this
Best regards,
Hey There
    Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-27-2008, 05:03 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 94
Sooooooo,,,how were these all paid for before these "fees" came into play year ago????
    Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-27-2008, 10:03 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hey There
Although Court costs aren't referred to as a tax they are for all practical purposes a tax paid by the driver who pleads or is found guilty of a traffic violation.
Not really. The definition of a tax in an involuntary funds or fees paid to a government. By contesting a ticket, one is voluntarily paying the court fee. In fact, by charging the court fee, everyone else is paying less in taxes or taxes don't need to be raised.

Quote:
Originally Posted by disneykid52
Sooooooo,,,how were these all paid for before these "fees" came into play year ago????
Taxpayers.
__________________
If you feel my answer is rude, mean, snarky or in anyway not to your liking, I did my job. You don't need to tell me.

No private messages, I do not reply to them.
    Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-27-2008, 03:17 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 94
So taxpayers money doesn't go to pay ANYTHING at all in the town anymore WHAT SO EVER??? INCLUDING the courthouse building???? I find that VERY hard to believe....
    Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-27-2008, 08:53 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,063
In today's world, lots of folks are tired of paying taxes to support others. One way to help offset this is to charge folks for certains services. When someone chooses to fight a traffic ticket, they are choosing to do so. Why should these people not pay for this service? There are many other services provided by the courts and folks have paid these costs for many years. Filing a civil lawsuit is one example.

Taxpayers are still paying for the courthouse. It provides many other services that do not include fees. I personally pay about $25,000 a year in federal, state and local taxes per year. That is money out of my pocket. Why should I pay the court costs because voluntarily chooses to fight a traffic ticket? I opinion is that person needs to pay the fees themself.
__________________
If you feel my answer is rude, mean, snarky or in anyway not to your liking, I did my job. You don't need to tell me.

No private messages, I do not reply to them.
    Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-28-2008, 12:27 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 386
Arrow

The Ball is in your court


4-28-08

disneykid52

Fees to cover aPart of the costs of the courts etc.are charged to the driver in addition to his fine.
Obviously courts, police depts, etc. have other sources of tax revenue.Money collected from fees tacked on to fines doesn't necessarily mean a reduction in taxes,only that the agencies that receive the money have more money to spend.
It is obvious that more revenue (Read Tax) can be generated in states that make a court appearance mandatory for more traffic citations and /or include the fees in the bail because drivers who contest their traffic ticket in court is a small group indeed.
This is not a new thing although I haven't researched when these fees were put in place in Florida or elsewhere.
I think these fees should be abolished BUT
there is no getting around paying these fees on top of the fine unless a driver contests his ticket and wins.
I hope this answers your question about court costs.

Best Regards,
Hey There
    Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:04 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.