coledog855
Junior Member
Thank you for your advice. So with the proper documentation, I might be able to plead guilty to having illegally darkened windows even though I was only given a verbal warning.
Provide that as evidence, a defense, that the windows attracted the attention, you had them tinted in good faith, not knowing they required certification or might have been too dark, perhaps the officer should have cited you for that, which was a fix-it ticket and you will provide the proof that it was done with the receipts, let the judge take it from there, so you are not pleading guilty you are providing a defense to the charges, it is up to the judge what happens. Essentially just tell the truth, present the facts/evidence, without accusing, give the judge respect and let the judge do their job. let us know how it goes.coledog855 said:Thank you for your advice. So with the proper documentation, I might be able to plead guilty to having illegally darkened windows even though I was only given a verbal warning.
That "lurch" is not a lurch at all. Happens when the inertia of motion in the undercarriage ceases, and the coach settles back on the springs/frame....when inertia of motion ends and inertia of rest begins. Sounds to me like you actually did come to a stop, and all these cops want to give you a hard time about your language and your tinted windows. Tell it to the judge. He or she may have a teenager and understanding that every kid with tinted windows is not a gangster.coledog855 said:I used the word "lurch" because I couldn't think of a way to describe what a complete stop feels like. I didn't sit at the sign for 3 seconds, but I didn't roll through it.
I would go for the jury trial.coledog855 said:You guys have been really helpful. I appreciate all of your advice, and I will take everything into account when preparing for this trial. Can someone tell me what would be the best decision. Trial by jury or having the judge make the decision?