Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > TRAFFIC LAW > Speeding and Other Moving Violations

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-04-2009, 06:52 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lake Oswego, OR
Posts: 1
Question

Failure to Yield to a Stationary Emergency Vehicle - Washington


I have already requested to contest a ticket I received and I would like some advice on the matter. I am an Oregon resident, and I was living near Seattle for a while and driving home. I was ticketed in Vancouver for "Failure to Yield to a Stationary Emergency Vehicle"

The police car was over on the left shoulder with no other cars. It was an undercover car trying to merge, but I couldn't tell with his other tail lights flashing. I was not speeding, but I slowed down when I saw him. I could have gotten over, but I realized it a little too late and just slowed down. However, he was not stationary and was going about 10mph in the shoulder trying to merge. I don't know if I'm admitting to something bigger by saying that, but he was not stationary. He pulled me over and after I gave him my Oregon information he said "it's been a law longer in Oregon than in Washington so you should know it by now" and went back and printed the ticket. If I don't win then I tried, but I feel that it was an odd circumstance and the ticket was not true to the situation. How can I help my case and what are my chances of success?

Washington Law
RCW 46.61.212

(1) On a highway having four or more lanes, at least two of which are intended for traffic proceeding in the same direction as the approaching vehicle, proceed with caution and, if reasonable, with due regard for safety and traffic conditions, yield the right-of-way by making a lane change or moving away from the lane or shoulder occupied by the stationary authorized emergency vehicle or police vehicle.

(3) If changing lanes or moving away would be unreasonable or unsafe, proceed with due caution and reduce the speed of the vehicle.What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)?
    Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-04-2009, 08:02 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,069
What RCW were you cited as violating? If it's the one in your post, your chances of winning are slim and none and slim is on his way out of town. I would suggest talking to a local attorney or consider asking for a deferral.
__________________
If you feel my answer is rude, mean, snarky or in anyway not to your liking, I did my job. You don't need to tell me.

No private messages, I do not reply to them.
    Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-04-2009, 09:34 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 116
I'll second the opinion of chances being slim in fighting this ticket. My own personnel strategy for WA. Chose the second option mitigation to explain the circumstance. Find any reasonable objection you have to the ticket is likely to at least reduce the amount of the fine in mitigation. I've seen reasonable objections get a dismissal in WA. Contesting seems to annoy "judges" of those hearing's.

A reasonable objection based on law is best:

Quote:
RCW 46.37.190
Warning devices on vehicles — Other drivers yield and stop.

(1) Every authorized emergency vehicle shall, in addition to any other equipment and distinctive marking required by this chapter, be equipped with at least one lamp capable of displaying a red light visible from at least five hundred feet in normal sunlight and a siren capable of giving an audible signal.
    Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.