danielmiguel
Junior Member
North Carolina, Forsyth County.
I was issued the above charges on Monday. The problem is that the following charges are inaccurate and I personally feel that the charges where based on what the other person involved said to the officer. I drive a Suzuki XL7 (2007), the car comes with a smart panel that gives you the driving conditions and advices you on driving arrangements, so it is impossible for me to have driven at a greater speed than prudent for ice and snow. The police officer acted as if I purposely and malignly caused the accident. Not only that but the other person suspiciously began "informing" the officer of what had occured in the event, conveniently while I was not present. On the other hand the word collision is truthfully not accurate to use in this scenario in the firt place. The word collide/collision means: two bodies (colliding bodies) coming into contact VIOLENTLY; to strike one another or against another with a FORCEFUL impact. In my case, I had an elastic collision with the curve, which made me slide (or bounce) back, making me HIT the car, but with minimal force. Now I would like to know how I can argue my point and case in court without sounding witty or a "smart arse", also what can be my best defense against the officer.
On a separate note, the other party is claiming to have had body injuries, which makes the entire situation even more suspicious.
I was issued the above charges on Monday. The problem is that the following charges are inaccurate and I personally feel that the charges where based on what the other person involved said to the officer. I drive a Suzuki XL7 (2007), the car comes with a smart panel that gives you the driving conditions and advices you on driving arrangements, so it is impossible for me to have driven at a greater speed than prudent for ice and snow. The police officer acted as if I purposely and malignly caused the accident. Not only that but the other person suspiciously began "informing" the officer of what had occured in the event, conveniently while I was not present. On the other hand the word collision is truthfully not accurate to use in this scenario in the firt place. The word collide/collision means: two bodies (colliding bodies) coming into contact VIOLENTLY; to strike one another or against another with a FORCEFUL impact. In my case, I had an elastic collision with the curve, which made me slide (or bounce) back, making me HIT the car, but with minimal force. Now I would like to know how I can argue my point and case in court without sounding witty or a "smart arse", also what can be my best defense against the officer.
On a separate note, the other party is claiming to have had body injuries, which makes the entire situation even more suspicious.