HOME LAW INSURANCE

Search      

Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > TRAFFIC LAW > Speeding and Other Moving Violations
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



               


Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-17-2006, 12:40 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1

Handcuffed and searched for a moving violation


What is the name of your state? Missouri
Is it standard procedure to pull someone over for a moving violation and have the driver exit the vehicle be asked to turn around so that he can be searched and placed in handcuffs? No arrest was made, only a ticket issued for the violation.
  #2  
Old 01-17-2006, 12:42 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ldij can lick my sphincter.
Posts: 1,274
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melinda
What is the name of your state? Missouri
Is it standard procedure to pull someone over for a moving violation and have the driver exit the vehicle be asked to turn around so that he can be searched and placed in handcuffs? No arrest was made, only a ticket issued for the violation.

My response:

Yes, if you're being a smartmouth - - or, if you fit the description of someone the police wish to locate.

IAAL

Last edited by m martin; 01-17-2006 at 08:57 PM.
  #3  
Old 01-17-2006, 12:52 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 984
.. To answer your question, there is no such thing as a universal SOP for traffic stops. Every PD has its own version. If you need to know, request it via Freedom of Information Act request. You will get it within ~40 days, so be sure to ask for continuance from the court if needed.

Last edited by m martin; 01-17-2006 at 08:58 PM.
  #4  
Old 01-17-2006, 12:54 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 10,871
To answer your question, there is no such thing as a universal SOP for traffic stops. Every PD has its own version. If you need to know, request it via Freedom of Information Act request. You will get it within ~40 days, so be sure to ask for continuance from the court if needed.[/quote]


You know...He was right...

Last edited by m martin; 01-17-2006 at 08:58 PM.
  #5  
Old 01-17-2006, 12:54 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Odo of Cluny Parish
Posts: 27,482
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melinda
What is the name of your state? Missouri
Is it standard procedure to pull someone over for a moving violation and have the driver exit the vehicle be asked to turn around so that he can be searched and placed in handcuffs? No arrest was made, only a ticket issued for the violation.
Yes, if you're being a smartmouth - - or, if you fit the description of someone the police wish to locate.
__________________
My signature is not working.

Last edited by m martin; 01-17-2006 at 08:59 PM.
  #6  
Old 01-17-2006, 01:08 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Catatonic State
Posts: 71,212
Quote:
Originally Posted by seniorjudge
Yes, if you're being a smartmouth - - or, if you fit the description of someone the police wish to locate.

**A: what about a dumbmouthed pain?

Last edited by m martin; 01-17-2006 at 08:59 PM.
  #7  
Old 01-17-2006, 01:28 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 984
OP has not given much detail, so leave your prejidice alone for the moment and look at this: [url]http://www.kcpd.org/masterindex/files/lb/LB%2005-05.pdf[/url]

Quote:
In the Barks case, the court held that under the Fourth Amendment, law enforcement officers who make a routine stop based on a violation of state traffic laws may detain a person only for as long as necessary to conduct a reasonable investigation of the traffic violation. That investigation may include asking for the driver’s license and vehicle registration, asking the driver to sit in the patrol car, and asking the driver about his or her destination and purpose. Absent reasonable suspicion that Barks was involved in criminal activity based on specific and articulable facts, the patrol officer did not have authority to detain Barks after giving him his speeding ticket.
On top of that, any search without PC has to be concentual. Nobody should be handcuffed for fitting the description of someone else. DL has enough proof of identity on it, so unless OP had no license he should not have been detained and searched.
  #8  
Old 01-17-2006, 03:47 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,356
Quote:
Originally Posted by sukharev
OP has not given much detail, so leave your prejidice alone for the moment and look at this: [url]http://www.kcpd.org/masterindex/files/lb/LB%2005-05.pdf[/url]


On top of that, any search without PC has to be concentual. Nobody should be handcuffed for fitting the description of someone else. DL has enough proof of identity on it, so unless OP had no license he should not have been detained and searched.
Handcuffing is a form of detention - I don't see any problem (legally) with what happened. He was released as soon as the "investigation" was complete.
  #9  
Old 01-17-2006, 03:52 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 257
Quote:
Originally Posted by sukharev
On top of that, any search without PC has to be concentual. Nobody should be handcuffed for fitting the description of someone else. DL has enough proof of identity on it, so unless OP had no license he should not have been detained and searched.
You are right, the OP is being very vague. But even with the slightest inkling, a person can be put into cuffs. To answer the OP's question, handcuffing someone on a "routine" traffic stop is not normal, so maybe this wasn't a routine traffic stop... i.e "being a smart mouth *******"!!!!

SUK, practice what you preach about not assuming what happened. Read your quoted post.... your assuming the OP did nothing to provoke the braceets. Even if he had a license, the handcuffs have every right to come out. Ever heard of fake id's??? Dopers got numerous ones.
  #10  
Old 01-17-2006, 03:53 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Odo of Cluny Parish
Posts: 27,482
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zigner
Handcuffing is a form of detention - I don't see any problem (legally) with what happened. He was released as soon as the "investigation" was complete.
It was a she; but I agree.

Officer safety....
__________________
My signature is not working.
  #11  
Old 01-17-2006, 04:49 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,356
Quote:
Originally Posted by seniorjudge
It was a she
My apologies
  #12  
Old 01-17-2006, 04:51 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Odo of Cluny Parish
Posts: 27,482
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zigner
My apologies
As the Pope of Trig, I am urging you to go and sine no more.
__________________
My signature is not working.
  #13  
Old 01-17-2006, 05:04 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by seniorjudge
As the Pope of Trig, I am urging you to go and sine no more.
No need to apologise Zigner.

Don't get so pompous Senior.
You were wrong again. It was a *he*.
Please read the original post more carefully!
  #14  
Old 01-17-2006, 05:14 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Odo of Cluny Parish
Posts: 27,482
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leviticus
No need to apologise Zigner.

Don't get so pompous Senior.
You were wrong again. It was a *he*.
Please read the original post more carefully!
Melinda in Missouri is a HE!?

Mirabile dictu!
__________________
My signature is not working.
  #15  
Old 01-17-2006, 08:37 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by seniorjudge
Melinda in Missouri is a HE!?
Melinda the OP is most likely a 'she'.

But she was describing an incident involving *another driver*, a 'he'.
"...and have the driver exit the vehicle be asked to turn around so that he can be searched and placed in handcuffs?"

Zigner caught this.
"... He was released as soon as the "investigation" was complete."

I caught it.

Can you see it now?
Closed Thread



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



Find a Lawyer
Step 1:
Step 2:
 
Find a Lawyer
Post Your Case
Post your case and have it reviewed by a highly respected attorney. NO Cost, NO obligation, NO Fees! Get started now »
Get Legal Forms
Download 36,000+ forms »


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:31 PM.

Contact Us - FreeAdvice - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top                                        


IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.