P
[email protected]
Guest
On 5/24/96 I was arrested in DE for speeding/DUI. Twenty-two days later, the cop wrote an arrest report that contained not one word of truth.
In 1996, speeding charges were dismissed without testimony because the cop failed to “swear” to the report before the hearing. DE DOJ successfully prosecuted for DUI ONLY until 4/14/99, utilizing the cop’s PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE testimony about the DISMISSED speeding charge.
Under the Freedom of Information Act, my Pennsylvania lawyer and I visited DE DOJ regarding their investigation of my complaint of false arrest for speeding. That report failed to consider the cop's claimed acceleration, and the Director of the Fraud Division directed me to discuss this with the Mayor of that DE town. He refuses.
I seek representation which will permit me to demonstrate that the cop’s Ford Taurus could not:
accelerate from stop, make a 90 degree right turn, pass two moving cars, change lanes, and catch up to a 50 mph car in 290 feet. Calculations by the CECON Group Accident Reconstruction Experts on request.
In 1996, speeding charges were dismissed without testimony because the cop failed to “swear” to the report before the hearing. DE DOJ successfully prosecuted for DUI ONLY until 4/14/99, utilizing the cop’s PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE testimony about the DISMISSED speeding charge.
Under the Freedom of Information Act, my Pennsylvania lawyer and I visited DE DOJ regarding their investigation of my complaint of false arrest for speeding. That report failed to consider the cop's claimed acceleration, and the Director of the Fraud Division directed me to discuss this with the Mayor of that DE town. He refuses.
I seek representation which will permit me to demonstrate that the cop’s Ford Taurus could not:
accelerate from stop, make a 90 degree right turn, pass two moving cars, change lanes, and catch up to a 50 mph car in 290 feet. Calculations by the CECON Group Accident Reconstruction Experts on request.