Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > TRAFFIC LAW > Speeding and Other Moving Violations

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-05-2006, 02:46 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3

IL speeding ticket - 87 in a 55 zone


What is the name of your state? Illinois.

I was nabbed on my way to work doing 87mph in a 55mph zone on I-90 eastbound just before I-290 by the Illinois State Police. The officer used lidar/laser and clocked me from a distance of 1146 feet. Obviously, a mandatory court appearance is required. The last ticket I received was in June 2005 for "driving in the wrong lane", and I received 90 days of supervision and had to attend a 4-hour traffic school session. Now, I need to know what my options are. The officer stated I could have paid the ticket on the spot, for a fee of $200, which I didn't have on me at the time. Does this particular speeding violation fall under the reckless driving category? What kind of fines should I be expecting to pay once my court date rolls around? I can NOT afford to have my license suspended, as I am a federal officer and I work 50 miles from home. Losing driving privileges is not an option. Is it likely that the judge will issue me a fine, put me on supervision, and assign me to the 8-hour traffic school session? Any input is appreciated.
    Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-05-2006, 09:50 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: medford oregon
Posts: 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by BD380
What is the name of your state? Illinois.

. The officer stated I could have paid the ticket on the spot, for a fee of $200, which I didn't have on me at the time. .
Oh wow. Do you mean you could have given the OFFICER the money for the ticket right then and there? Now THAT is a law I would try to have taken off the books! What an opening for embezzlement, false ticketing... oh the list is endless!! Please tell me Ive misunderstood what you mean!!

Carrie
    Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-05-2006, 01:24 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarrieT
Oh wow. Do you mean you could have given the OFFICER the money for the ticket right then and there? Now THAT is a law I would try to have taken off the books! What an opening for embezzlement, false ticketing... oh the list is endless!! Please tell me Ive misunderstood what you mean!!

Carrie
His exact words were "if you don't want me to take your license as bond, you can pay $200 cash or check, no credit cards".
    Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-05-2006, 03:18 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 160
Posting a bond of $200 is not the same as paying the fine. Did the officer take your license?
__________________
My state: PA
I am not an officer of the court. All responses are based on my personal experience and/or research of other sources.
"Look: here's the thing about law and technicalities. Law is a technical discipline. Like any science, it is a body of doctrine that is technical..." - Jeremy Waldron, Professor of Law
"Chance favors the prepared mind" - Louis Pastuer
    Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-05-2006, 08:33 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. KnoWhere
Posts: 404
Looks lke 40+ is reckless in IL

[URL=http://www.mit.edu/~jfc/laws.html]State Traffic and SPeed Laws[/URL]

If you are worried about your employement, I recommend seeking professional legal advise.
    Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-10-2006, 01:14 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by loulblades
Posting a bond of $200 is not the same as paying the fine. Did the officer take your license?
Yes he did.
    Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-10-2006, 08:56 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 160
Then the license was used as bond. If you belonged to AAA you could have presented the membership card as bond and held on to your license. It's good up to $1000.
__________________
My state: PA
I am not an officer of the court. All responses are based on my personal experience and/or research of other sources.
"Look: here's the thing about law and technicalities. Law is a technical discipline. Like any science, it is a body of doctrine that is technical..." - Jeremy Waldron, Professor of Law
"Chance favors the prepared mind" - Louis Pastuer
    Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:25 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.