Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > TRAFFIC LAW > Speeding and Other Moving Violations

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-20-2005, 05:59 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3

IMPROPER start/stop South Carolina 56-5-2110


South Carolina


Got charged today with improper start/stop- violation section 56-5-2110

ARTICLE 15

STARTING AND TURNING; SIGNALING
SECTION 56-5-2110. Starting of a vehicle.

No person shall start a vehicle which is stopped, standing or parked unless and until such movement can be made with reasonable safety.

So thats what it says.

What happend was...

I was on my way to work this morning about 6:40am.... I had come to the end of my street (Stop Sign). RIght directly in front of me was a city police officer in a marked car. The vehicle was directly in my sight. I was traveling in a southward direction when approaching the sign, while he was facing in a easterly direction on an empty lot where a house used to be.
Well I saw him.... PLain as day.

I feel as if I stopped at the sign... Maybe not 5 seconds or anything like that. BUt at least 1 second of stop time. It was 6:40 in the morning with nothing happening..... No traffic at all. No kids around... Well I proceeded turning right... He pulled out of his spot right after I pulled away. Followed me about .1 of a mile and then through his blue lights.

He came to the window and asked "Do you know why I pulled you over?" and in all honestly I had no idea. THen he proceeded to tell me that I made a incomplete stop.

Well anyways- whats the best defense??? He came back with my ticket- said "This could have been a $300 fine but you were very nice and respectable... So I dropped it to $150..... "

Ill be honest the whole time he was in his squad car- I was thinking it will be a warning or a small fine.... But $150- that makes it seem like I just flat out ROLLED through it at 10 mph or something....

I need help- The way that the law reads above- I am totally INNOCENT! BUt how do you convince a judge? Or should a jury be the answer?

Any help and ideas appreciated... - I figure the fact of his facing direction in comparison with me would be one defensive angle.

Thanks and sorry it was so long!
    Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-20-2005, 08:03 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,607
You have the right to request a trial by jury. If you want to go that route then it will be your version against the officer and the jury will decide. You can show up on your court date and they might agree to some type of reduction. If not you can plead not guilty and ask for the trial. Sometimes they will then make another offer since they want your money and don't want to spend time on a jury trial with a traffic ticket. Take cash.


Ask around and find out the normal procedures for your court. Downside is that if you go to trial and lose the fine could be much higher.
    Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-20-2005, 10:18 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Elgin, IL USA
Posts: 1,089
Obviously you were stopped if he cited you for a starting violation. Did you signal your right turn? What did he say you did dangerously when you pulled away from the stop sign?

Sometimes it pays to look up the statutes. Hint, he did not cite you for failing to stop.
    Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-05-2005, 02:01 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2
First, look to see if there really is a difference in the violation $$$. If so, maybe the officer was being nice(r). Fight it, and maybe he'll view it as "trying to look a gift horse..." in court. Second, if you really believe your innocent and stopped at the intersection, fight it. He wrote the charge. Cops do this all the time with this charge. Most people don't look at what the statue reads to see if it applies to their situation. Look at this Indiana case: [url]www.state.in.us/judiciary/opinions/archive/10180001.lmb.html[/url]. Be prepared to appeal to a higher court because the cops and their employers are looking for revenue, not fair and balanced application of the law. "To Serve and Collect" is the new motto. You can see this by the number of Deferred Adjudication + fine + it won't go on your record and Defensive Driving School + fine + it won't go on your record judgements that are issued. Revenue. baby, revenue. Fight 'em. Even if you need an attorney, fight 'em. These type of tickets have to stop.

Last edited by rlem1977; 05-05-2005 at 02:05 PM.
    Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-05-2005, 06:56 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,140
Quote:
Originally Posted by rlem1977
the cops and their employers are looking for revenue, not fair and balanced application of the law. "To Serve and Collect" is the new motto. You can see this by the number of Deferred Adjudication + fine + it won't go on your record and Defensive Driving School + fine + it won't go on your record judgements that are issued. Revenue. baby, revenue. Fight 'em. Even if you need an attorney, fight 'em. These type of tickets have to stop.
You're absolutely right. I think we should stop accessing monetary fines of any kind against traffic violators.

I think we should Jail them instead.

Doing 10 over the speed limit? 10 days straight time, County Work Farm.

Doing 25 over? 30 days wearing an orange jump suit in the County Jail.

Rolled a stop sign? 5 days.

If we started that, you've have a lot fewer people being lax about traffic laws. And the ones that still are will be clamoring...begging to pay a fine instead of going to Jail.

    Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:20 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.