| You could have some fun with this, if you willing to give it a try.
There is case law in FL where lawyer walked in to a traffic case with another person told the judge his client will not be testifying (never identifying who the other person was), then proceeded to question the officer. He asked the officer to identify the person who he gave a ticket to and he identified the guy standing next to him. He ask the officer what that persons name was and officer of coursed read from the ticket. He then had the other person to take the stand at which point the judge said "I thought you said your client would not be testifying" at which point the lawyer said "he is not my client." So the got up on the stand and simple identified himself which he was not the person who the officer identify. At which point the lawyer asked for an immediate dismissal base on the fact the officer was not a reliable witness.
Needless to say the judge went nuts because he felt it was trickery and found the lawyers client guilty. The the Supreme court of FL did not see it that way, they said the officer was free to identify the correct person and fail to do so therefore was unreliable and the client was found not guilt due to improper identification.
Not sure this is something you could do, but, a good lawyer willing to use the same logic could get this ticket tossed on the bases officer can not correctly identify the right person if your bother is willing to show up in your place.
Last edited by Maestro64; 05-16-2008 at 10:23 AM.
|