Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > TRAFFIC LAW > Speeding and Other Moving Violations

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-13-2009, 11:48 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3
Unhappy

NY Chataqua County Sheriff Speeding Ticket?


What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? NY
My question involves a speeding ticket from the State of: New York, by the Chataqua county sheriff. My 17 year old son was driving about 300 yards in front of us home from dinner. The sheriff was coming from the other direction, and clocked him at 52mph. The thing is, he was about 12 feet from the sign that changed the speed limit from 35 to 55. He had just seen the sign and started speeding up. I know in PA the police officer cannot run "speed" within 500 ft of a speed limit change, am not sure on NY laws. I would argue that a 17 year old, could be seen as a speeder, but with his parents right behind him? Not in the picture, it is our new (used) car (5 days old), and he is use to driving our SUV, would be terrified we would take the car away. The other reason I am sure of his speed, is our 16 yr old just started driving on her permit, and we are really teaching her about speeds and driving period, she was driving so we were talking about her speeds.

Thanks in advance for any advice you can offer.
    Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-13-2009, 12:25 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 99
Well there are a couple defences I know in court that Basic Speed law says he was driving at a unsafe speed, maybe telling the Judge as a LAST RESORT that he dident really brake the law (Road, Weather, Clear Traffic, Sign Up Ahead).
    Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-13-2009, 12:32 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Back in LA LA land
Posts: 1,694
So, you stated that he did speed up here...

Quote:
Originally Posted by soccermomiam View Post
He had just seen the sign and started speeding up.
... but then you suggested that he couldn't have been speeding, here...
Quote:
Originally Posted by soccermomiam View Post
I would argue that a 17 year old, could be seen as a speeder, but with his parents right behind him?
How fast do you think he was going before he passed the 55mph sign?
__________________
"Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security” ~ Benjamin Franklin
    Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-13-2009, 12:35 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Back in LA LA land
Posts: 1,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by AgentSmithers View Post
Well there are a couple defences I know in court that Basic Speed law says he was driving at a unsafe speed, maybe telling the Judge as a LAST RESORT that he dident really brake the law (Road, Weather, Clear Traffic, Sign Up Ahead).
The "Basic Speed Law" does not apply to every speeding citation. Only when a driver is cited for California Vehicle Code section 22350... And even then, that only applies in CALIFORNIA. New York state might not have the same law on their books!
__________________
"Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security” ~ Benjamin Franklin
    Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-13-2009, 12:47 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by I_Got_Banned View Post
So, you stated that he did speed up here...


... but then you suggested that he couldn't have been speeding, here...


How fast do you think he was going before he passed the 55mph sign?
I guess I did confuse that a bit. He was speeding up. He was about 15 feet from the sign when the officer passed him going the opposite direction, he looked at the sign and checked his speed. He was going 50 at that point. He had not been going faster than the 35 mph. prior to seeing the speed limit sign
    Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-13-2009, 01:11 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Back in LA LA land
Posts: 1,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by soccermomiam View Post
I guess I did confuse that a bit. He was speeding up. He was about 15 feet from the sign when the officer passed him going the opposite direction, he looked at the sign and checked his speed. He was going 50 at that point. He had not been going faster than the 35 mph. prior to seeing the speed limit sign
A speed limit zone begins once you pass the sign which states that particular speed limit.

If in your untrained opinion you think he was traveling at 50mph before passing the 55mph sign, then I would venture to guess that an officer (who is trained to have the ability to more accurately gauge other vehicles speeds) charging him with driving at 52mph might not be so wrong! Additionally, you didn't mention whether the officer relied purely on a visual estimate or whether he used a device to measure the speed. But that too can dictate the accuracy of his measurement/estimate.

Either way, 50mph in a 35mph zone OR 52mph in a 35mph zone are both considered speeding, no matter how you look at it.

I would offer you more as far as how you might be able to defend against this charge but it is my understanding that the process may differ based upon the area where you reside in New York. So I will leave that up to someone who knows more than I do about those particulars. IO will however say that depending upon the period that your son has had his license for, might also dictate that he is still under a probationary license and if that is the case, any two convictions of moving violations can result in a temporary suspension of his driving privilege.
__________________
"Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security” ~ Benjamin Franklin
    Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-13-2009, 01:19 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3
The officer used a radar reading while he was traveling in opposite direction. This is my son's first ticket for anything, and will be turning 18 in 2 months, at which time he will get his PA lic. He has a junior lic from pa as of now since he was 16.5.
    Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-13-2009, 01:58 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Back in LA LA land
Posts: 1,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by soccermomiam View Post
The officer used a radar reading while he was traveling in opposite direction. This is my son's first ticket for anything, and will be turning 18 in 2 months, at which time he will get his PA lic. He has a junior lic from pa as of now since he was 16.5.
The officer's direction of travel is irrelevant since the Radar equipment will account for his speed in relation to that of the moving target. Having said that, I will add that his using Radar makes a bit tougher of a fight.

As for his Jr license from PA, initially, the case is being adjudicated in NY... As for his status of his Jr license, PA's rules will apply once they find out and assuming he is in fact found guilty.
__________________
"Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security” ~ Benjamin Franklin
    Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:55 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.