HOME LAW INSURANCE

Search      

Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > TRAFFIC LAW > Speeding and Other Moving Violations
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



               


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-11-2007, 03:11 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3

Photo enforcement (red light violation)


What is the name of your state? Ohio

HB 56 was vetoed back in Jan of 07. Do I have to pay for a volation that I recieved or should I elect to go to a hearing and dispute this case?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-11-2007, 03:34 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Washington state
Posts: 10,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by firemandave View Post
What is the name of your state? Ohio

HB 56 was vetoed back in Jan of 07. Do I have to pay for a volation that I recieved or should I elect to go to a hearing and dispute this case?
HB-56 would have placed numerous restrictions on red light cameras, it does not outlaw them. Because it was vetoed, there are very few restrictions in place on red light cameras. Whether you want to fight the ticket or not depends on what you want to do.
__________________
If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, expect an answer you don't want to hear.

No private messages, I do not reply to them.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-11-2007, 03:56 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3
So, then it would more cost effective to just pay the ticket than to get a lawyer and make a supreme court case outta this.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-11-2007, 04:02 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,275
Quote:
Originally Posted by firemandave View Post
So, then it would more cost effective to just pay the ticket than to get a lawyer and make a supreme court case outta this.

That is a question for YOU to answer, not the members of an anonymous internet forum.
__________________
*
*
The information I gave is based on my 7 seconds of research on Google. Review the information yourself to make an informed decision. Also, the information I posted may no longer be accurate.

Communication is KEY - 10 mins of talking now can save you months of headaches later!

Masterfully stating the obvious to the oblivious! (Thanks SP!)

Tell it like it is!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-11-2007, 05:10 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 271
I would first vote out your governor...

Grant it I do not agree that an officer need to be present, this gets rid of the hearsay issue when you try to fight it in court. But it looks like they were attempting to make sure all the camera systems operated the same way across the state so each local government did not do their own thing and get rid of the revenue sharing issue.

PA has a very good statute on the books for red-light cameras, it is the longest and most thorough of the rules of the roads sub-chapters PA has. It explains exactly how it must be done, the traffic studies that are required and how the light and cameras must be set up. These are set up on Phily which I have seen people run a light 2 or 3 seconds after my light turn green. Those people just ignore all the traffic signs so anything there is an improvement.

So vote the guy out and get your local rep to put the law throw again. And you can attempt to fight it on the hearsay issue, since you do have a right to confront your accuser which in this case is a camera.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-11-2007, 07:07 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3
Thank you for the input
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-19-2007, 12:50 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 271
A case is being heard right now in the Ohio Supreme court which could end the use of Photo enforcement in Ohio

[url]http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/19/1976.asp[/url]

Well at least turn it back to criminal charge verse civil, it appear local government rewrote the laws and made ticket issued as part of photo enforcement a civil offense. There by limiting your ability to fight the ticket, since you can not argue hearsay, and the local government only needs to assert that it is more likely than not that a violation occurred.

Hope your Supreme Court Justices can see that these things are about money not people safety.

Oh it took an Lawyers wife getting one of these tickets to take it to the supreme court.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



Find a Lawyer
Step 1:
Step 2:
 
Find a Lawyer
Post Your Case
Post your case and have it reviewed by a highly respected attorney. NO Cost, NO obligation, NO Fees! Get started now »
Get Legal Forms
Download 36,000+ forms »


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:01 AM.

Contact Us - FreeAdvice - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top                                        


IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.