I was pulled over by a NYS Trooper for speeding. He wrote the ticket as an equipment violation: after-market tint on windows. He attached a supporting deposition to the ticket that only includes information about the speed I was travelling and what I said about that speed (I was honest about seriously thinking the speed limit reduced to 45 before going to 30, so he timed me at 45 just outside a village).
I'd recently bought the vehicle used and didn't know the tint was after-market or that it was illegal. I've had it removed since receiving the ticket and now need to proceed.
First, do I plead guilty and hope that the fine will be minimal because I've already rectified the situation? Or plead not-guilty and hope the case will be dismissed because I've already rectified the situation? This doesn't seem clear-cut to me because I didn't put the tint on the windows and didn't know it was against the law, but maybe I should have because I was driving it?
Then, no matter which way I plead, do I have to include the deposition with the ticket when I mail it in? It can't possibly benefit me because it shows the judge that I was already "cut a break."
I'd recently bought the vehicle used and didn't know the tint was after-market or that it was illegal. I've had it removed since receiving the ticket and now need to proceed.
First, do I plead guilty and hope that the fine will be minimal because I've already rectified the situation? Or plead not-guilty and hope the case will be dismissed because I've already rectified the situation? This doesn't seem clear-cut to me because I didn't put the tint on the windows and didn't know it was against the law, but maybe I should have because I was driving it?
Then, no matter which way I plead, do I have to include the deposition with the ticket when I mail it in? It can't possibly benefit me because it shows the judge that I was already "cut a break."