Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > TRAFFIC LAW > Speeding and Other Moving Violations

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-29-2008, 04:25 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2

Prosecution question


I have a question about the prosecution of my speeding ticket. I was on a college campus and the campus police officer 'claims' that I was speeding 19 miles in a 10 mph speed limit. He sent a summons stating that I was speeding and resisting and evading. I filed a motion to produce a number of items. I recieved the information: there was no tape either visual or audio that demonstrates me supposedly running from him, there was no tape or print out from the speed gun. It is his word against mine...not to mention that i have a witness in the vehicle during this period. This officer has recently quit his job with campus security and has been hired on to the city police force. I am doing this cas pro se, so the magistrate told me that he (the cop) has to prosecute the case (not the DA). So....here are my questions: 1. Can this cop prosecute a ticket against a person when he is no longer employed by that agency (State University)?
2.) Does the calibration certificate have to be certified?
I would appreciate any information that might help me to dismiss this case/ or try it. Thanks eergael
    Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-29-2008, 04:27 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Odo of Cluny Parish
Posts: 29,043
Quote:
Originally Posted by eergael View Post
I have a question about the prosecution of my speeding ticket. I was on a college campus and the campus police officer 'claims' that I was speeding 19 miles in a 10 mph speed limit. He sent a summons stating that I was speeding and resisting and evading. I filed a motion to produce a number of items. I recieved the information: there was no tape either visual or audio that demonstrates me supposedly running from him, there was no tape or print out from the speed gun. It is his word against mine...not to mention that i have a witness in the vehicle during this period. This officer has recently quit his job with campus security and has been hired on to the city police force. I am doing this cas pro se, so the magistrate told me that he (the cop) has to prosecute the case (not the DA). So....here are my questions: 1. Can this cop prosecute a ticket against a person when he is no longer employed by that agency (State University)?
2.) Does the calibration certificate have to be certified?
I would appreciate any information that might help me to dismiss this case/ or try it. Thanks eergael
Why did you intentionally delete your state?
__________________
There are two rules for success:

(1) Never tell everything you know.
    Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-29-2008, 04:28 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2

eergael's state


I live in New Mexico.
    Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-30-2008, 12:07 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,309
Quote:
Originally Posted by eergael View Post
there was no tape either visual or audio that demonstrates me supposedly running from him, there was no tape or print out from the speed gun. It is his word against mine...not to mention that i have a witness in the vehicle during this period.
There are some things you need to keep in mind. Firstly, the officer does not need any video footage. Secondly, I don't know of any radar units that produce any sort of printout, so again, not necessary. In fact, a radar reading isn't even actually required because an officer that has gone through radar training has actually been trained to VISUALLY estimate speeds. Also, my guess is your witness won't mean squat. The officer is considered to be an unbiased, uninterested party, while you and your witness have obvious reasons to bend the truth.
__________________
Due to popular demand, I have edited my signature:

I may have "Senior Member" status, but that's because I know more than you!
    Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-30-2008, 02:44 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 11
It's VERY easy to confuse police officers on the stand and create reasonable doubt in the eyes of the judge or magistrate. I speak from experience, if you want to get off of minor traffic violations, you almost always can. It's a matter of how much time you want to put into research.
    Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-30-2008, 05:27 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: California
Posts: 18,446
Send a message via AIM to CdwJava Send a message via Yahoo to CdwJava
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blaker View Post
It's VERY easy to confuse police officers on the stand and create reasonable doubt in the eyes of the judge or magistrate.
Really? ... odd ... my experience is quite the opposie.

But, to each his own.

- Carl
__________________
A Nor Cal Cop Sergeant

"Make mine a double mocha ...
And a croissant!"

He Who Kneels Before God
Can Stand Before Anyone

....author unknown
    Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-01-2008, 04:42 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,309
I agree with Carl. I've yet to see evidence to support Blaker's claim, and I have sat in on a lot of traffic cases. The closest I've seen is when the defendant hires a traffic attorney, and what usually results is some sort of plea bargain; I've yet to see a traffic attorney successfully create doubt from an officer's testimony. I'm not saying it's impossible, I just haven't seen it yet.
__________________
Due to popular demand, I have edited my signature:

I may have "Senior Member" status, but that's because I know more than you!
    Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:04 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.