![]() |
| ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| | |||||||||||||
| |||||||
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Red light Photo TicketArizona ![]() I recieved a ticket in the mail for allegedly running a red light in Tucson, Az. I was in the intersection when the light was yellow,so I continued my turn, they claim that since I was not past the 3rd line approx. 5 feet past the crosswalk I was not actually in the intersection, there are only 2 intersections with this "magic" line in the city of Tucson, all the others do not have them even though they too have cameras there were also no signs indicating what the other line was for. Do I have a chance of beating this? Further, If a Mexican National, Canadian or anyone else with an out-of-state / country license plate these tickets are not being persued. I KNOW it's not "Just" but can they legally do this? Please help if you can my court date is next week. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
....I live in Tucson also, This place sucks....seems like they have nothing better to do than to give tickets via photo camera. Also have you noticed their yellow lights don't last long enough. If I'm in the middle of an intersection and the light turns yellow, I have to gun it to make sure I got across in time!!! When you go to court tell the judge you want to question your accuser ( the camera) ![]() I read online once that a man actually won his case by using that! I guess legally you have a right to question whoever is acussing you and since you can't really question a camera then he won.... but not sure how accurate this was, but it was funny
__________________ never argue with an idiot, they always win with experience |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| We Love Tucson, this whole Big Brother mentality is really starting to piss me off though.. In the paper today the county sheriff is considering photo radar too ,(Not for the money though) they repeated this several times in the interview, to quote the great Bard;"Me thinks M'lady Doth protest too loudly"Donnie "Some Times I Wonder, Why Is That Frisbee getting larger?? Then It Hits Me. ![]() |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| If the line existed, and you were not in the proper place in relation to the line, then you are guilty of the charge. Ignorance of this law, unfortunately, does not excuse you from it. If you feel that this law is less than a good idea, then feel free to contact the necessary legislatures to see about having this law amended, but do note that this will not get you off the hook for your current charge.
__________________ Due to popular demand, I have edited my signature: I may have "Senior Member" status, but that's because I know more than you! |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Respectfully I submit, how was I to know what that line was significant of, without the public being informed? |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
If you can show that the time actual time the signal is on yellow is not sufficient to get you through the intersection if you are travelling at the speed limit, before it changes to red then you win! Quote:
I don't mind Red Light Cameras... I would rather be cited by a Red light Camera than to be cited by an officer who was looking on the opposite direction when I entered the intersection and yet he goes to court and testifies under oath that he saw me enter on "RED".
__________________ "Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security” ~ Benjamin Franklin Last edited by I_Got_Banned; 12-13-2008 at 01:46 PM. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| It's very likely that the public was informed, and the public wasn't paying attention. You can try to fight the cite based on this argument, but expect the court to retaliate with what mediums were used to inform the public.
__________________ Due to popular demand, I have edited my signature: I may have "Senior Member" status, but that's because I know more than you! |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| I agree ignorance of the law is no defense and people should know the rules. One of those rules is the yellow timing must be in accordance to the MUTCD and many of these lights fail to meet the minimum standard. In that case you could know the rules and the government changes the playing field (ie the light timing) and you are still required not violate the law. Many times these types of ticket are civil matter thus you have no rights to have the state prove the light meets the requirements. The light can be complete in violation of the law and you still have to pay. As an example if you in the intersection on when it turns red they ticket you. I personally observed camera taking pictures This also go to confronting your accuser, they will not allow you that defense many times. If it is all about traffic safety, why all the tricks to keep you from defending yourself.
__________________ I am not a lawyer nor am I in law enforcement, I will not make any value judgment on why you're asking a questions. I will try to provide information so you can make an informed decisions so take it for what is worth and do your own research. Remember it is easy to tell someone they will lose verse providing knowledge. Lastly, I have no vested interest in your outcome win, lose or draw and the same goes for anyone else. |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Maestro, please be aware that the advice you are giving is to a poster that is not the OP; please don't aid in hijacking ![]()
__________________ Due to popular demand, I have edited my signature: I may have "Senior Member" status, but that's because I know more than you! |
![]() |