Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > TRAFFIC LAW > Speeding and Other Moving Violations

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-06-2006, 09:09 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 984

Reopening Locked Thread: Speeding 50 in 30 by Norton


What is the name of your state? MA

Somehow thread below got locked, even though it was not finished at all, and I have not seen any messages staing that it has been. Here is the link, and I am going to post my reply to the last message below.

[url]http://forum.freeadvice.com/showthread.php?t=300112[/url]

Last edited by sukharev; 03-06-2006 at 09:27 AM.
    Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-06-2006, 09:25 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 984
Hi, Norton:

sorry it took me longer, but here is some more detail on the radar defense.

1) do radar forks calibration and serial number match the ones used to test the radar?

If they don't, then radar was not tested properly, and ticket should get dismissed. Find out through discovery whether radar test was recorded before and after the shift, and if yes, they should provide you with the test log. In the test log, forks calibration should also be recorded, and their serial number should match the one used in testing the radar.

2) was radar test done before and after shift?

If not, motion for dismissal, it's mandated by caselaw.

3) did PD have FCC license?

We had an interesting debate on this issue, you can look up the thread, but basically FCC license is almost always there, but does not hurt to check. It needs to be properly renewed, and frequencies allowed need to match those of the radar.

4) was officer properly trained (find out requirements)?

It's would help your case if he was not.

5) was the place formally checked for interference?

It would help your case if it was not. By itself it's not a big factor, but does allow you to claim that radar reading could be due to interference.

6) does the ticket say that traffic was heavy/medium?

This is where radar can become unreliable, because its beam is wide. If there is a chance the beam was hitting another car (depends on the distance from radar), you can argue that it's possible.

7) was there a chance for sweep, ghost reading or other well-known radar errors (find them on the web)?

Frequently happening are errors due to radar positioning and mode of operation. Again, it helps your case to argue that the reading came from somewhere else, or was unreliable.

8) Time over distance calculation.

Ask officer about distance he observed your car at, then ask how much time has passed before you passed him. Divide one by the other, and you will get the estimated speed. If that speed is lower than the one on the ticket, point this out to the judge (but don't say that that's what your speed was, just point out the discrepancy in officer's testimony).
    Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-07-2006, 08:01 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 24
I got it. Thank you so much for all the advice you have given me! Are you by chance a lawyer? If not, you seem to know a lot about Traffic Law. Have a good week!
    Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.