![]() |
| ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| | |||||||||||||
| |||||||
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Speeding Ticket - Columbia, PAWhat is the name of your state? Pennsylvania On 26th of last month, I received a ticket for doing 84 in a 55 (+29), (S 75 $3362 $$A2-29, Exceed 55 mph in other loc by 29 MPH). I know I am guilty of this, however, I just have a question concerning my trial. I pleaded not guilty and received a trial date of VALENTINE'S DAY. I was informed it was a five point violation, however, if I would try and request a no-points violation at the expense of a higher fine, would I need to call the officer beforehand and request this from him? Or would I need to appear in court for this? Also, would it be beneficial for me to hire a lawyer and take my place of this? The reason I request a no-points violation is I'm currently in college and travel from Philadelphia home (~100 miles) almost every weekend and would prefer not to have these points on my license. Also, if I approach the lawyer route, would I try and hire one from Philadelphia or Columbia? I appreciate those that took the time to read this, and any response is greatly appreciated. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
![]()
__________________ My new signature: Originally Posted by arazi Quote:
|
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Sorry about the miscommunication. I was searching on this website and others earlier for advice before I posted and found things like this: Quote:
Quote:
I wasn't sure if these were true, so I figured I'd ask. Also, what I meant about the traveling is that since I drive a lot, I feel as if I'd have a greater chance of getting a ticket than if didn't drive at all once I was here at school. Because of that, I'd like to have a buffer if possible in case I received another ticket before my points expired. I hope that cleared things up! Thanks. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| You can try to cut a deal with the prosecutor, not the judge. At least one of the examples that you quoted was for another state. I drove 3 hours each way to school for years, and I never got a ticket. That's because I chose not to speed.
__________________ My new signature: Originally Posted by arazi Quote:
|
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| In my 30+ years of driving I have received more than a few tickets in PA. I have pleaded not guilty to them all except my first one at 17 (I paid the ticket to make it go away, but my license was suspended). Anyway, not once was there a prosecutor in the room. Only the officer, magistrate and me. If you want to plead with the officer, you will generally take that opportunity just before the hearing. You may be able to get an Obedience to traffic control devices (3111A I think) which the state still gets your money but you don't suffer the points. Do your research. One sight is findlaw.com and some of the fight your ticket websites. Oh there was a prosecutor involved once when I requested a dismissal, at a hearing that I was "accused" of going 97 in a 65, by referencing case law that was 30 years old. The magistrate had to call the prosecutor to verify that it was still "applicable". It was and I got the dismissal. BTW you are guilty when you plead guilty or the magistrate says you are.
__________________ My state: PA I am not an officer of the court. All responses are based on my personal experience and/or research of other sources. "Look: here's the thing about law and technicalities. Law is a technical discipline. Like any science, it is a body of doctrine that is technical..." - Jeremy Waldron, Professor of Law "Chance favors the prepared mind" - Louis Pastuer |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Just keep in mind, PA is special :-) what I mean is the trial isn't really a trial, it's a "magistrate" hearing. No rules of civil/criminal procedure apply, and you can only hope for a good judge (which you can indeed get, it depends on the court). And oh, yes, you can always try to call the officer - with luck you can talk to him and try to get a break that way. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
There's also some restrictions on entering radar evidence isn't there sukharev - has to be original from state testing station and current...
__________________ _____________________________________________________ “[w]hen a statute is clear and unambiguous and the legislative intent is plain, the statute should not be interpreted by the courts, and in such case it is the duty of the courts not to construe but to apply the statute.” "The right to travel is a part of the liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the 5th Amendment." Kent v. Dulles, 357 US 116, 125. |
![]() |