Watertown, MA
MA
I hopeful that someone can help me out here. I recently received a speeding ticket where the officer stated he used LIDAR, estimated speed, posted.
I now find myself being one of the thousands of people a day wondering if I'm SOL simply because I received the ticket. The ticket is written for 40 in a 20. This was a designated school zone so it falls under absolute speed rules.
I truly have no idea how fast I was traveling, however, I was in an unfamiliar neighborhood and looking for a street sign that I needed to turn down so I was not zipping around corners checking to see how well my car corners. I was going slower than traffic and was even passed by several vehicles, so I have to question the accuracy of this ticket.
The officer told me that he was going to pull the car over in front of me but picked me because of how I quickly swerved out of the lane I was in and into the other lane. This was done because the driver in front of me decided to apply her breaks (I'm guessing because she saw the officer and the officer didn't see her break lights) and instead of breaking I chose to just move into the other lane. The lane change was swift, I had looked at my NAV to see how far up my turn was and my attention was caught by the break lights, but legal.
My "evidence":
- Google maps showing the distance provided for the estimated speed would have meant that the officer would have needed to begin his visual estimate at the previous street.
- Pictures of both corner's, the officer could have been standing, that show the officer could not have had a clear sight of my car at the distance he stated.
After that long narrative, my concern is that this is not going to be enough evidence for the presiding magistrate from all the horror stories of civil traffic court in MA... Would this suffice for most magistrates? I ask because at my first hearing the officer will not even be there and it will be my story and evidence against the officer's notes and a ticket.
Thank you for any advice or suggestions,
Greg
MA
I hopeful that someone can help me out here. I recently received a speeding ticket where the officer stated he used LIDAR, estimated speed, posted.
I now find myself being one of the thousands of people a day wondering if I'm SOL simply because I received the ticket. The ticket is written for 40 in a 20. This was a designated school zone so it falls under absolute speed rules.
I truly have no idea how fast I was traveling, however, I was in an unfamiliar neighborhood and looking for a street sign that I needed to turn down so I was not zipping around corners checking to see how well my car corners. I was going slower than traffic and was even passed by several vehicles, so I have to question the accuracy of this ticket.
The officer told me that he was going to pull the car over in front of me but picked me because of how I quickly swerved out of the lane I was in and into the other lane. This was done because the driver in front of me decided to apply her breaks (I'm guessing because she saw the officer and the officer didn't see her break lights) and instead of breaking I chose to just move into the other lane. The lane change was swift, I had looked at my NAV to see how far up my turn was and my attention was caught by the break lights, but legal.
My "evidence":
- Google maps showing the distance provided for the estimated speed would have meant that the officer would have needed to begin his visual estimate at the previous street.
- Pictures of both corner's, the officer could have been standing, that show the officer could not have had a clear sight of my car at the distance he stated.
After that long narrative, my concern is that this is not going to be enough evidence for the presiding magistrate from all the horror stories of civil traffic court in MA... Would this suffice for most magistrates? I ask because at my first hearing the officer will not even be there and it will be my story and evidence against the officer's notes and a ticket.
Thank you for any advice or suggestions,
Greg