
Originally Posted by
lwpat Since you claim to be a judge explain how a law requiring the court to consider something in determining guilt or innocence cannot be properly labeled as an acceptable defense in presenting the case.
Virginia law varies from most states in allowing the defendant to produce a calibration record of their speedometer. The normal rule is that if the officer's speedometer was properly calibrated in a pacing situation you are guilty regardless of what your speedometer reads.
As a pratical matter many judges regardess of the law in their state will consider a certified test and may reduce the ticket if you can show that your speedometer has been repaired. Tenn is the only other state that I know of that has a law similar to VA.