Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > TRAFFIC LAW > Speeding and Other Moving Violations

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-06-2008, 11:50 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2

Technically a wrong charge on my ticket


What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? VA

The charge on my ticket says "operating all-terrain vehicle on roadway", but I was actually driving a go-cart. The Code of Virginia defines an all-terrain vehicle as a vehicle with "a seat designed to be straddled by the operator, and handlebars for steering...The term does not include four-wheeled vehicles, commonly known as "go-carts," that have low centers of gravity..."

Given that I was driving a go-cart, and not an all-terrain vehicle, can I say that I am technically not guilty of the charge on my ticket, and get away with it?What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)?
    Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-06-2008, 11:55 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 21,746
What, exactly, were you cited with?
__________________
*
*
The information I gave is based on my 7 seconds of research on Google. Review the information yourself to make an informed decision.

Communication is KEY - 10 mins of talking now can save you months of headaches later!

Masterfully stating the obvious to the oblivious! (Thanks SP!)

Tell it like it is! When all else fails, make up a statistic!

Gender references shall apply equally to the other gender. I will not correct gender mistakes (unless I want to)
    Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-06-2008, 12:16 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2
I was driving an off-road go-cart on my neighborhood road. My ticket says:

LAW SECTION: 416.2-915.1
DESCRIBE CHARGE: OPERATING ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE ON ROADWAY

Again, per the Code of Virginia, I was not driving an all-terrain vehicle. As such, per the letter of the law, can I say that I wasn't guilty of the charge?
    Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-06-2008, 12:33 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 21,746
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatCar View Post
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? VA

The charge on my ticket says "operating all-terrain vehicle on roadway", but I was actually driving a go-cart. The Code of Virginia defines an all-terrain vehicle as a vehicle with "a seat designed to be straddled by the operator, and handlebars for steering...The term does not include four-wheeled vehicles, commonly known as "go-carts," that have low centers of gravity..."

Given that I was driving a go-cart, and not an all-terrain vehicle, can I say that I am technically not guilty of the charge on my ticket, and get away with it?What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)?
It sounds like you are technically not guilty of this charge.
That's not to say that you can't be charged with a different violation...
__________________
*
*
The information I gave is based on my 7 seconds of research on Google. Review the information yourself to make an informed decision.

Communication is KEY - 10 mins of talking now can save you months of headaches later!

Masterfully stating the obvious to the oblivious! (Thanks SP!)

Tell it like it is! When all else fails, make up a statistic!

Gender references shall apply equally to the other gender. I will not correct gender mistakes (unless I want to)
    Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-06-2008, 05:26 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 802
I don't know VA law... but if you go to the vehicle code (or equivilant), there should be a section of definitions. If the definition of All Terrain Vehicle doesn't describe your go-kart, then you are correct. However, you'd be surprised at some of the bizzare definitions that pop up, so make sure you check.
    Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-07-2008, 09:02 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 17
This sounds similar to the time I tried to fight a speeding ticket ( I did the speeding) because the time listed on the ticket was off by one hour. I had proof that I was no where near that location at the time listed on the ticket. The judge said that the patrolman's error when writing the ticket did not excuse my violation of the law and I had to pay the fine.
    Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-07-2008, 09:56 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 802
Quote:
Originally Posted by bisjoe View Post
This sounds similar to the time I tried to fight a speeding ticket ( I did the speeding) because the time listed on the ticket was off by one hour. I had proof that I was no where near that location at the time listed on the ticket. The judge said that the patrolman's error when writing the ticket did not excuse my violation of the law and I had to pay the fine.
Many traffic judges simply ignore the law. They believe that Joe-sixpack won't appeal. The fact is, in your case, you were charged with driving a particular speed at a particular place and at a particular time... which apparently you did not do.
    Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-07-2008, 10:38 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 21,746
Quote:
Originally Posted by bisjoe View Post
This sounds similar to the time I tried to fight a speeding ticket ( I did the speeding) because the time listed on the ticket was off by one hour. I had proof that I was no where near that location at the time listed on the ticket. The judge said that the patrolman's error when writing the ticket did not excuse my violation of the law and I had to pay the fine.

The fact of the matter is that the error on your ticket didn't rise to a level whereby the ticket would be voided. Your situation is NOT the same as the OP.
In the OP's case, he was accused of something that he did not do. Period.
__________________
*
*
The information I gave is based on my 7 seconds of research on Google. Review the information yourself to make an informed decision.

Communication is KEY - 10 mins of talking now can save you months of headaches later!

Masterfully stating the obvious to the oblivious! (Thanks SP!)

Tell it like it is! When all else fails, make up a statistic!

Gender references shall apply equally to the other gender. I will not correct gender mistakes (unless I want to)
    Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.