 | 
10-07-2005, 07:01 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1
| | | Typo, Help! IL, Kane County. My ticket states Sept 20th when I was actually given the ticket on sept 18th. I was about to mail it off as "guily with probation" by going to school. Should I go to court and fight it instead? How can I find out if the officer was even on duty on the 20th, if not, that would make for an easy dismissal, one would think!? Any suggestions, clock is ticking! Thx | 
10-07-2005, 08:21 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Washington state
Posts: 10,652
| | | The error does not prevent you from presenting a valid defense to the citation. One of two things will happen if you fight the ticket. Either the judge will correct the error himself or the judge will dismiss the ticket and have the officer give you one that is correct.
__________________
If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, expect an answer you don't want to hear.
No private messages, I do not reply to them.
| 
10-11-2005, 12:30 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8
| | | TYPO - Possibly a good thing for you If you are certain that the ORIGINAL traffic citation has the incorrect date, then it would be in your best interest to take it to court. Forget about calling it a typo though, but rather find proof (hard evidence) that you were somewhere else at the time of the citation and, therefore, cannot be convicted.
I would lead off by asking the officer if the information on the citation is correct - DO NOT ASK IF HE REMEMBERS YOU. If he says "Yes" (which he will unless he wants to admit he's an idiot), then you have no more questions for him. All you need to do next is to submit proof (a time and date stamped receipt at a gas station / grocery store / etc., your time clock at work, etc.) that you were in another place at the time of the citation.
Even though you signed the ticket, since the officer agreed on the stand that the information on the ticket was correct - now every other detail, including the speed you were travelling, is now questionable, at best.
Make sure that you do not agree to "Preponderance of Evidence" as the standard of proof (the prosecutor will probably ask for this at the beggining), but submit for "Beyond a reasonable doubt". If that is denied, agree to using "Clear and Convincing Evidence" as the standard of proof.
Good Luck! | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread | Linear Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | |