![]() |
| ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| | |||||||||||||
| |||||||
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Vehicle Stopped for PedestriansWhat is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? California It was 8:30pm and I was driving in the lane to the left of an officer on a motorcycle after being stopped at a stop light. We both stopped at a complete stop in our lanes to allow pedestrians to finish crossing. When the pedestrians were stepping onto the sidewalk, I slowly went ahead (especially because I knew he was there). The officer then pulled me over and asked me if I had seen the ladies crossing. I said yes. He then said that there was another lady on the island who was about to cross. Then he said that I could not overtake a vehicle at a cross walk. At that point I was confused. First of all, the island was very narrow and I and my passenger were sure that no one was there, as I am a careful driver and was especially careful because of his presence. Second, I didn't think I overtook any vehicle. So I believed he was referring to himself, as he was in the right lane next to me. So he charged me for 21951 CVC (Crosswalk Overtaking Vehicle). The ticket also states that I was going 25 mph at the time, which is the right speed for a business area anyway. BUT how could I be going through the crosswalk at 25 mph when I was at 0 mph some feet away from the crosswalk? I definitely did not accelerate that quickly. Should I have been charged? The California Vehicle Code states: "Whenever any vehicle has stopped at a marked crosswalk or at any unmarked crosswalk at an intersection to permit a pedestrian to cross the roadway the driver of any other vehicle approaching from the rear shall not overtake and pass the stopped vehicle. " I was not coming from the rear-- I was stopped next to him and allowed the pedestrians to cross. When the pedestrians were stepping on the sidewalk I slowly went. I'm so confused . When I go to court for this, is it worth arguing? And if it is, is it appropriate for me to explain to the judge as I did here? Thanks everyone. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Welcome to the People's Republic of Kalifornia. As you described it (unless I am wrong) you were the first in line at the red light adjacent to the cop who was first in line in his lane. By definition, you could NOT possibly have passed anyone from the rear because you were not behind anyone. Not only should you go to court and argue this, but you should do it in such a way that makes it clear to the court and all of those listening just what kind of a moron this cop is. Cops who get their jollies by writing tickets for just anything really pi$$ me off. Good luck. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
![]()
__________________ * * The information I gave is based on my 7 seconds of research on Google. Review the information yourself to make an informed decision. Communication is KEY - 10 mins of talking now can save you months of headaches later! Masterfully stating the obvious to the oblivious! (Thanks SP!) Tell it like it is! When all else fails, make up a statistic! ![]() Gender references shall apply equally to the other gender. I will not correct gender mistakes (unless I want to) |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| You are finally getting smart and agreeing with me... congratulations. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| ^^^Obviously doesn't understand sarcasm.^^^^
__________________ If you feel my answer is rude, mean, snarky or in anyway not to your liking, I did my job. You don't need to tell me. No private messages, I do not reply to them. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
Thank youThanks, I just needed another opinion Hopefully this works out |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| I've never been to court before. Will I just have to explain to them what happened? I'm not quite sure about how this goes. Also, what are my chances of having my fine reduced or charged dropped, and what do I need to do to have any of those happen? |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| ^^^Obviously doesn't recognize a well placed return volley!^^^ |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
Make sure you understand the law you have been charged with violating, ask you passenger to testify for you and simply go into trial and tell you story. Don't cower if you are innocent!! |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
Typically, when you appear in court on or before the date stated on your citation you will be required to enter a plea of "Guilty" or "Not Guilty"... You are not usually allowed to to give an explanation of what happened or why you think you are guilty or not guilty... If you plead guilty, the Judge will tell you the amount of your fine and you will be referred to the clerk's office to pay that amount... If you plead "not guilty" then a trial date will be set for a later date, you maybe required to post bail for the amount of the fine (which will be refunded to you if you are found not guilty at your trial). On your trial date, the officer will show up, and testify/tell his version of the events as well as his reasoning as to why in his view, you should be cited and fined. After that you will get an opportunity to question him if you choose to. Which will then be followed by the court giving you an opportunity to testify on your own behalf. Once the court hears the officer's testimony and yours (assuming you choose to testify) it will render a verdict as to your guilt or innocence. That is basically it in a nut shell... There are a few websites on the internet ( example: [url=http://www.helpigotaticket.com/sitemap.html]Help! I got a traffic ticket.[/url] ) and a few books (example: [url=http://www.nolo.com/product.cfm/ObjectID/5049A39C-99F3-41FF-BA270821A98897B9/104/263/]Fight Your Ticket & Win in California[/url] ) that you might find at your local library than can explain the process to you in greater detail. If you happen to come up against any unanswered questions, then feel free to post those questions here in this thread and we will be more than happy to help out as much as we can. Keep in mind that the process of taking a traffic ticket to trial, and although it is not impossible, it can be very time consuming... Your case does, however, seem to be pretty simple to prove in which case you should be found not guilty and (hopefully) you will not have to pay a fine. Good luck
__________________ "Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security” ~ Benjamin Franklin Last edited by I_Got_Banned; 03-18-2009 at 09:09 AM. |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| I_Got_Banned and Jim_bo Thank you so much for your helpful responses. If I come across any questions I may need answers to, I will reply here in the next couple of days. |
![]() |