Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > TRAFFIC LAW > Speeding and Other Moving Violations

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-14-2007, 02:29 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 95

What is CVC 2245 (a)


What is the name of your state? CA


Today I was pull over by the transit police at a railroad corssing in a vehical.

I am goint to contest it. But...

First I need to know what I was cited for.

It said on the ticket that it was cited for CVC 2245(A). I tried looking this up on a CA statute site where it have all the cvc but it does not have this one. It said failure to stop for activated rr crossing signal. I also did a search on the net.

Did the police wrote down the wrong citiation number. He wrote my year of birth wrong too.

thanks
    Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-14-2007, 02:41 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not a lawyer
Posts: 133
It seems like he forgot a '0'. What I did find is CVC 22450(a)

Stop Requirements

22450. (a) The driver of any vehicle approaching a stop sign at the entrance to, or within, an intersection, or railroad grade crossing shall stop at a limit line, if marked, otherwise before entering the crosswalk on the near side of the intersection.

If there is no limit line or crosswalk, the driver shall stop at the entrance to the intersecting roadway or railroad grade crossing.

(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a local authority may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution providing for the placement of a stop sign at any location on a highway under its jurisdiction where the stop sign would enhance traffic safety.

Link: [url]http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d11/vc22450.htm[/url]

Or It might be 22451 since you said it was about a railroad signal

Railroad or Rail Transit Grade Crossings

22451. (a) The driver of any vehicle or pedestrian approaching a railroad or rail transit grade crossing shall stop not less than 15 feet from the nearest rail and shall not proceed until he or she can do so safely, whenever the following conditions exist:

(1) A clearly visible electric or mechanical signal device or a flagman gives warning of the approach or passage of a train or car.

(2) An approaching train or car is plainly visible or is emitting an audible signal and, by reason of its speed or nearness, is an immediate hazard.

(b) No driver or pedestrian shall proceed through, around, or under any railroad or rail transit crossing gate while the gate is closed.

(c) Whenever a railroad or rail transit crossing is equipped with an automated enforcement system, a notice of a violation of this section is subject to the procedures provided in Section 40518.

Link: [url]http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d11/vc22451.htm[/url]

Last edited by GatorLaw; 11-14-2007 at 02:50 PM. Reason: Added second statute
    Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-16-2007, 12:47 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 802
Seems like a cool break for you. I'd just go to court and say that you tried to prepare a defense for VC2245, but you could not. Certainly there will be no evidence there to convict you of that.
    Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.