• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

ads, again

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

P

pbs55

Guest
Re Andy Warhol, that is exactly the case I was thinking of. But I don't happen to know if he had a problem, and I have (lightly) searched several AW sites for that info. Also, since I would be using actual ads, cut into pieces, and he painted the item, is there any difference?

Thanks, again--
Pamela
 


I AM ALWAYS LIABLE

Senior Member
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by pbs55:
Re Andy Warhol, that is exactly the case I was thinking of. But I don't happen to know if he had a problem, and I have (lightly) searched several AW sites for that info. Also, since I would be using actual ads, cut into pieces, and he painted the item, is there any difference?

Thanks, again--
Pamela
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>


My response:

Okay, the answer to the Andy Worhol conundrum is "No." Whether you paint them, or cut them out, descriptions of products and their "reconstruction" on canvas, or whatever medium, are still "artistic expression" and are not subject to copyright infringement.

Now, for my sage information, in exchange, I want a 20"X30" collage for my office, consisting mainly of Chiquita Banana ads and Attorney advertisements. You figure out the relationship.

IAAL



------------------
By reading the “Response” to your question or comment, you agree that: The opinions expressed herein by "I AM ALWAYS LIABLE" are designed to provide educational information only and are not intended to, nor do they, offer legal advice. Opinions expressed to you in this site are not intended to, nor does it, create an attorney-client relationship, nor does it constitute legal advice to any person reviewing such information. No electronic communication with "I AM ALWAYS LIABLE," on its own, will generate an attorney-client relationship, nor will it be considered an attorney-client privileged communication. You further agree that you will obtain your own attorney's advice and counsel for your questions responded to herein by "I AM ALWAYS LIABLE."

 
P

pbs55

Guest
Thank you! As for that banana/attorney combo...a couple of possible connections come to mind, but...nah...couldn't be any of those...I hope...

I'll work on it!

Pamela
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top