What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? WI
If there are 3 members in a member-managed LLC and one member leaves, how are his shares divided between the remaining members absent relevant language in the agreement? Am I correct in assuming that the default rule (WI, but non-state specific is fine) is that, after the departing member is compensated for the value of his shares, the LLC effectively "absorbs" the departing member's shares so the remaining members are left with their proportional % interest?
Ex: there are 100 total shares. A has 50%, B has 30% and C has 20%. A leaves and both B and C are willing and able to purchase as many of his shares as they can (both would like majority ownership). Would B and C's shares now be increased based on their original %, i.e. B now has 60% (30 of remaining 50 shares) and C has 40%? One would think the market could also prevail and B and C could have a bidding war for A's shares. Issue gets tougher if it is a family business and A, dad, originally intended for sons B and C to eventually be 50-50 partners by the time A left? But, for A to simply make B and C 50-50 would be unfair to B, who would only get a boost of 20% out of A's shares, while C would increase 30%. Even A just dividing his shares equally to B and C (25 to each) would leave B with 55% and C with 45%. B and C could have a bidding war offering A more and more money for majority share, but in the family example it would be tough for A to choose which of his sons B and C to sell majority share to (essentially, picking a favorite), so A may rather let the default rule be the bad guy.
I know there are potentially other questions embedded in that example, but my main question here is if the default is for the LLC to absorb the departing member's interest and the existing members would remain at their proportional %? Thanks in advance for any input!
If there are 3 members in a member-managed LLC and one member leaves, how are his shares divided between the remaining members absent relevant language in the agreement? Am I correct in assuming that the default rule (WI, but non-state specific is fine) is that, after the departing member is compensated for the value of his shares, the LLC effectively "absorbs" the departing member's shares so the remaining members are left with their proportional % interest?
Ex: there are 100 total shares. A has 50%, B has 30% and C has 20%. A leaves and both B and C are willing and able to purchase as many of his shares as they can (both would like majority ownership). Would B and C's shares now be increased based on their original %, i.e. B now has 60% (30 of remaining 50 shares) and C has 40%? One would think the market could also prevail and B and C could have a bidding war for A's shares. Issue gets tougher if it is a family business and A, dad, originally intended for sons B and C to eventually be 50-50 partners by the time A left? But, for A to simply make B and C 50-50 would be unfair to B, who would only get a boost of 20% out of A's shares, while C would increase 30%. Even A just dividing his shares equally to B and C (25 to each) would leave B with 55% and C with 45%. B and C could have a bidding war offering A more and more money for majority share, but in the family example it would be tough for A to choose which of his sons B and C to sell majority share to (essentially, picking a favorite), so A may rather let the default rule be the bad guy.
I know there are potentially other questions embedded in that example, but my main question here is if the default is for the LLC to absorb the departing member's interest and the existing members would remain at their proportional %? Thanks in advance for any input!