Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Tax Law : Federal, State and Local Income Taxes, Sales Taxes, etc. For Estate, Gift and Inheritance Taxes, Please Post Under Will, Trusts & Estate Planning
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > TAX LAW > Tax Law

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-24-2007, 11:27 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 11,774

EIC x 3?


What is the name of your state? MO

Ok, I'm doing my taxes and am ready to e-file my return. I used H&R Block's software, and ran the error check twice. This is the same software I used last year, and everything was just fine, so I'm fairly trusting that it's correct this time too...

But here's the 'problem':

I have 3 kids.... two that I claim as dependents and one that is claimed by my exhusband. All three kids live with me the majority of the time.

I claimed the 2 dependents, and when I got to the EIC portion of the return, it asked me if there were any non-dependent children living with me, to which I answered yes (oldest daughter whom ex claims) just as I did last year when I only had 2 kids.

The software allowed me to claim my 2 dependents for EIC AND the non-dependent child. My issue is that I thought you were only allowed to claim 2 kids for EIC... is the non-dependent child a loophole?

I have a call in to H&R Block, but I'm a little impatient to get this filed.

Help?
__________________
Though no one can go back and make a brand new start, anyone can start from now and make a brand new ending.
~ Carl Bard
  #2  
Old 01-24-2007, 12:32 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 41,403
Quote:
Originally Posted by CJane View Post
What is the name of your state? MO

Ok, I'm doing my taxes and am ready to e-file my return. I used H&R Block's software, and ran the error check twice. This is the same software I used last year, and everything was just fine, so I'm fairly trusting that it's correct this time too...

But here's the 'problem':

I have 3 kids.... two that I claim as dependents and one that is claimed by my exhusband. All three kids live with me the majority of the time.

I claimed the 2 dependents, and when I got to the EIC portion of the return, it asked me if there were any non-dependent children living with me, to which I answered yes (oldest daughter whom ex claims) just as I did last year when I only had 2 kids.

The software allowed me to claim my 2 dependents for EIC AND the non-dependent child. My issue is that I thought you were only allowed to claim 2 kids for EIC... is the non-dependent child a loophole?

I have a call in to H&R Block, but I'm a little impatient to get this filed.

Help?
Does the H&R Block software let you see the actual forms prior to transmission?

EIC can only be claimed for two children, and most software automatically selects the two youngest children. Therefore I think that you could be confused as to what the software is saying you can do. My concern would be that its accidentally giving you the exemption for the oldest. In any case, you really need to see the forms to see what its actually doing.
  #3  
Old 01-24-2007, 12:50 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 11,774
Quote:
Originally Posted by LdiJ View Post
Does the H&R Block software let you see the actual forms prior to transmission?
Yes. I printed them out.

Quote:
EIC can only be claimed for two children, and most software automatically selects the two youngest children. Therefore I think that you could be confused as to what the software is saying you can do. My concern would be that its accidentally giving you the exemption for the oldest. In any case, you really need to see the forms to see what its actually doing.
Yeah, I think I just need a LOT more coffee.

Apparently, while it let me put in the info for the oldest (the one the ex claims) and told me that she was a qualifying non-dependent, it didn't figure her into the final amount... I assumed that it did because the refund amount is significantly more than I thought it would be, but it doesn't show her info anywhere on the forms.

So I should be good, right? Assuming the software is finding no redflags or errors?
__________________
Though no one can go back and make a brand new start, anyone can start from now and make a brand new ending.
~ Carl Bard
  #4  
Old 01-24-2007, 07:14 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 41,403
Quote:
Originally Posted by CJane View Post
Yes. I printed them out.



Yeah, I think I just need a LOT more coffee.

Apparently, while it let me put in the info for the oldest (the one the ex claims) and told me that she was a qualifying non-dependent, it didn't figure her into the final amount... I assumed that it did because the refund amount is significantly more than I thought it would be, but it doesn't show her info anywhere on the forms.

So I should be good, right? Assuming the software is finding no redflags or errors?
Yep...all should be good.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:39 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.