• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Inheritance

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

notfound

Junior Member
What is the name of your state? Washington

My father-in-law passed away in August of 2003, well he didn't have a will and his wife had already passed away many years before, so the house had to go through probate (This is in California). The house was then sold to one of his children (my wife's brother) and all the children received a portion of the equity that was in the house (sold for $170,000... balance on home was around $62,000) so after attorney fees and everything each child got roughly $20,000.

Now my wife's oldest sister said that the whole process and everything was run though their father Social Security Number, so her sister is saying that her tax preparer told her it doesn't have to be claimed as income on taxes. Is this correct? It just doesn't seem correct to me, I don't want to not include it on taxes and then get audited and be told that I should have.

Let me know if you need any additional information to help clarify this situation. Thanks
 


abezon

Senior Member
Generally, inheritances are not taxable. You don't include the $20,000 anywhere on the return.

However, I have a hard time believing that the house was worth only $170,000. Did your brother-in-law pay fair market value? If he didn't, the estate owes the heirs the difference between the FMV price & what he actually paid. Selling to 1 heir for less than FMV is a breach of the administrator's fiduciary duty to the other heirs.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top