scottzagoria
Member
What is the name of your state? CA
thanks in advance. i'm writing on behalf of albert, my friend, who is still trying to reclaim his dogs from the county after an 'adversarial' de novo judgment. forgive me, i'm not an attorney, and i do not mean to wax eloquent. my question is in fact quite straightforward. albert mentioned to me prior to his initial hearing that he had not been served. i have read online that it doesn't take much to serve someone, but the minutes of the trial states this in no uncertain terms, i.e., 'un-served'. albert has had a bit of online help with filings from a nice attorney, but he's been through the ringer, so to speak. i'm wondering if anyone can comment on whether the 'un-served' is conceivably something albert can exploit in some fashion. thank you all very much for your consideration and very best wishes.
thanks in advance. i'm writing on behalf of albert, my friend, who is still trying to reclaim his dogs from the county after an 'adversarial' de novo judgment. forgive me, i'm not an attorney, and i do not mean to wax eloquent. my question is in fact quite straightforward. albert mentioned to me prior to his initial hearing that he had not been served. i have read online that it doesn't take much to serve someone, but the minutes of the trial states this in no uncertain terms, i.e., 'un-served'. albert has had a bit of online help with filings from a nice attorney, but he's been through the ringer, so to speak. i'm wondering if anyone can comment on whether the 'un-served' is conceivably something albert can exploit in some fashion. thank you all very much for your consideration and very best wishes.