Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > EMPLOYMENT AND LABOR LAW > Union Issues

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-19-2009, 09:37 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3

Collective Agreement / Wage Increase


I just have a quck question. I am not in the US but I am in Ontario, Canada. I realize this is just for US legal advice, but this question is pretty broad and as our laws are very similar it might be relevant. So I would greatly appreciate your advice. I can not a find a similar forum discussing Canadian law.

So here is how it goes. I was a member of the united steelworkers and I worked for a security company here in Toronto. GARDA was the company. I believe it is in the US as well, but they mostly do cash handling. I passed my probationary period which is 90 days OR a certain number of hours. I passed the hours so I am no longer a probationary employee.

On July 1st, 2009 the collective agreement stated there would be a %2.5 increase in the hourly wage. By this time I passed my probation period using the hours method rather than the days method.

Nobody in the company that I am aware of (I have asked many workers) have received their %2.5 increase. All were people who have worked for the company for years.

I asked the company about the %2.5 increase but nothing was done. They basically just shrugged it off. Typical.

I quit out of outrage. %2.5 is literally $0.28 more per hour and the pay was below industry standards already.

Want I want to ask is, is a collective agreement considered generally to be a legally binding, enforceable contract? If so, now that I quit, am I able to persue action to get back pay that is owed to me from the $0.28 per hour I was not getting? Or is the contract between the union and the company and only the union can persue legal action?

My second question is that they said I MUST return the uniform and pay for cleaning etc, to get my last paycheque. It will be taken off my last paycheque. With what I understand there are no preconditions to getting my pay, my pay is my pay and they must give it to me. If they want uniform cleaning costs they can only persue legal action, without my authorization they can not take the money out of my cheque or put any conditions on my last cheque. (I have not signed any papers at the beginning of my employment authorizing this that I recall.)

The way I look at it is if I worked at a cellphone service provider and I have an account with them. I am a bit behind on my bill, lets say $100, and I quit my job at the service provider. They have no right to garnish my wage for the $100 I owe them. I view this situation very similarly.

Anyways sorry for the long post, but any answers would be appreciated. I am more interested in the uniform/cleaning costs question. I know countries and states the law can change quite a bit, but just please answer me "generally" or "in most states" etc. I just want to see if my hypothesis is feasible at all.

Thanks!
  #2  
Old 09-19-2009, 10:21 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,063
US law only.
__________________
If you feel my answer is rude, mean, snarky or in anyway not to your liking, I did my job. You don't need to tell me.

No private messages, I do not reply to them.
  #3  
Old 09-19-2009, 10:40 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3
Ok.

I just have a quick question. I am not in the US but I am in Ontario, Canada. I JUST want to KNOW ABOUT NEW YORK STATE LAW a what-if situation.

So here is how it goes. A guy was a member of the united steelworkers and he worked for a security company in New York City. The hypothetical employee passed his probationary period which is 90 days OR a certain number of hours. He passed the hours so he is no longer a probationary employee.

On July 1st, 2009 the collective agreement of his union stated there would be a %2.5 increase in the hourly wage. By this time he passed his probation period using the hours method rather than the days method.

Nobody in the company that he was aware of (He have asked many workers) have received their %2.5 increase. All were people who have worked for the company for years.

He asked the company about the %2.5 increase but nothing was done. They basically just shrugged it off. Typical he thought.

He quit out of outrage. %2.5 is literally $0.28 more per hour for him and his pay was below industry standards already.

Want he wants to ask is, is a collective agreement considered generally to be a legally binding, enforceable contract? If so, now that he quit, is he able to persue action to get back pay that is owed to him from the $0.28 per hour he was not getting? Or is the contract between the union and the company and only the union can persue legal action?

My second question is that lets say they told him he MUST return the uniform and pay for cleaning etc, to get his last paycheque. It will be taken off his last paycheque. With what he understands there are no preconditions to getting his pay, his pay is his pay and they must give it to him. If they want uniform cleaning costs they can only persue legal action, without my authorization they can not take the money out of my cheque or put any conditions on my last cheque. (He have not signed any papers at the beginning of my employment authorizing this that he can recall.)

The way he looks at it is if he worked at a cellphone service provider and he also has an account with them. If he is a bit behind on his bill, lets say $100, and he quit his job at the service provider. They have no right to garnish his wages for the $100 he owes them. He views this situation very similarly.

Anyways sorry for the long hypothetical post, but any answers would be appreciated. I am more interested in the hypothetical uniform/cleaning costs question in New York state.

Thanks!
  #4  
Old 09-19-2009, 12:50 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Feels like Mars sometimes.
Posts: 2,241
I am in Canada and have a strong working knowledge of both Canadian and American labour laws. This includes knowing that labour laws in New York state and the province of Ontario are very very very very very different.

So, do you really want to know about New York state law, or are you figuring that if you get information about New York state law it'll apply to your situation in Ontario because New York state happens to be geographically close to Ontario? (If the latter, you figure wrong.)
  #5  
Old 09-19-2009, 12:56 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Feels like Mars sometimes.
Posts: 2,241
I just read your posts a little more thoroughly and believe you're asking a Canadian question.

You should not have quit, you should have had the union get the money for you. Now that you've quit, the union probably can't do anything for you (though they probably can get the other still-employed SOs their pay increase).

You may file a claim for your last paycheque with the Employment Standards, however it will take them at least a year (more like 18 months) to process your claim. You'll get paid a heckuva lot faster if you just return the uniform.
  #6  
Old 09-19-2009, 05:48 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3
Thanks so much for your help.
At least it gave me an idea. Much much appreciation.

Closed Thread



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:00 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.