HOME LAW INSURANCE

Search      

Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > EMPLOYMENT AND LABOR LAW > Union Issues
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



               


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-06-2007, 10:42 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 15

Sick Use and OT Question


What is the name of your state? CA

I work for a CA. County Gov. I have an 84-hr pay period. We have a supervisor that submitted a proposal that if we call in sick for a day (burning sick time), which would make us "work" less than 84-hrs and then have OT during the pay period, the supervisor is saying we should not receive OT pay for the OT day since we did not work the 84hrs, is this legal? He states we should not receive OT pay unless we have over 84hrs "worked" and sick pay does not count.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-06-2007, 10:51 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 6,095
Sick pay doesn't count... and from one county employee to another, that's the way we do it down here...

Read your MOU, you may get some clarification there. If not, call your union.
__________________
CC's rule of life #1.2:

Parents: If you give your children the opportunity to learn how to live without you, don't be mad years from now when they do. In order to have a relationship with your children, you have to stay INVOLVED with your children. At all costs, even if it makes the CP or your kids mad.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-06-2007, 10:58 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by CourtClerk View Post
Sick pay doesn't count... and from one county employee to another, that's the way we do it down here...

Read your MOU, you may get some clarification there. If not, call your union.
So if you call in sick and don't work your 80hrs you will not get paid OT?

My MOU states:;

5.3. Overtime

For the purposes of determining an employee's eligibility for overtime compensation, all
straight time hours on payroll shall be considered "hours worked".

Since sick time is paid in straight time on payroll should this not trump the supervisor?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-06-2007, 11:01 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 6,095
Nope, and we've gone back and forth and back and forth again about this with our union...

Straight time is consider hours worked. You didn't work to get your sick time. I just got a copy of our updated MOU, let me see what ours says on the subject.
__________________
CC's rule of life #1.2:

Parents: If you give your children the opportunity to learn how to live without you, don't be mad years from now when they do. In order to have a relationship with your children, you have to stay INVOLVED with your children. At all costs, even if it makes the CP or your kids mad.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-06-2007, 11:11 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 6,095
Here's how mine reads:

The Court will provide paid or accumulated compensatory overtime for all hours worked in excess of forth (40) hours in one week. "Hours worked" will be calculated as provided for by the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 201, et seq. Hours worked do not include time for which persons are compensated but do not actually work: including but not limited to sick leave and vacation pay, with the exception that those hours paid during a work week for a regular Court holiday will be counted in calculating hours worked for overtime purposes.

So, we make a distinction...you may want to contact your union rep
__________________
CC's rule of life #1.2:

Parents: If you give your children the opportunity to learn how to live without you, don't be mad years from now when they do. In order to have a relationship with your children, you have to stay INVOLVED with your children. At all costs, even if it makes the CP or your kids mad.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-07-2007, 03:28 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 171
My husband isn't a gov. employee but he is union. They work 40hr pay periods(paid weekly) with OT over 40. If they call in sick they are still paid any overtime they worked or will work in the rest of the pay period. I guess we are lucky. I didn't realize many places don't do it that way.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-07-2007, 07:13 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by IrishNodak View Post
My husband isn't a gov. employee but he is union. They work 40hr pay periods(paid weekly) with OT over 40. If they call in sick they are still paid any overtime they worked or will work in the rest of the pay period. I guess we are lucky. I didn't realize many places don't do it that way.
This is how we are paid at this time, I think it's the way our county does it, and this supervisor is trying to make a name, hopefully he'll fall flat on his face !!!!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-07-2007, 09:51 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 6,095
Please see cbg's (an HR expert) response below. It was in the other thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by cbg View Post
Overtime is paid on hours worked, not on hours paid. If you did not work, those hours do not count towards overtime calculations.
__________________
CC's rule of life #1.2:

Parents: If you give your children the opportunity to learn how to live without you, don't be mad years from now when they do. In order to have a relationship with your children, you have to stay INVOLVED with your children. At all costs, even if it makes the CP or your kids mad.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-08-2007, 07:34 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by IrishNodak View Post
My husband isn't a gov. employee but he is union. They work 40hr pay periods(paid weekly) with OT over 40. If they call in sick they are still paid any overtime they worked or will work in the rest of the pay period. I guess we are lucky. I didn't realize many places don't do it that way.

This is how it's was done at our shop. Until some started abusing the system. Working unneeded OT on Thursday, then taking of early on Friday.

It's now back to over 40.
__________________
I'm not an attorney or in law enforcement.
Just curious.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-08-2007, 10:03 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by milk man View Post
This is how it's was done at our shop. Until some started abusing the system. Working unneeded OT on Thursday, then taking of early on Friday.

It's now back to over 40.
Thats what our problem is, people working 3-4 days OT then calling in sick on the regular shift. I think our county might consider sick pay as straight time and thats why it is done, at least for now.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-08-2007, 11:27 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by fred82 View Post
Thats what our problem is, people working 3-4 days OT then calling in sick on the regular shift. I think our county might consider sick pay as straight time and thats why it is done, at least for now.
There are always jokers that ruin a good deal for everyone.

Instead of dealing with the jokers the bosses just say okay, everyone is reduced.

And the most pitiful thing......the chief offenders are long gone from the company.
__________________
I'm not an attorney or in law enforcement.
Just curious.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-09-2007, 01:13 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by milk man View Post
There are always jokers that ruin a good deal for everyone.

Instead of dealing with the jokers the bosses just say okay, everyone is reduced.

And the most pitiful thing......the chief offenders are long gone from the company.
Thats how I feel, they will not take on the offenders but have no problem attacking the whole.

It's like if a few people got the flu, they would kill every body as a way to solve the problem.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



Find a Lawyer
Step 1:
Step 2:
 
Find a Lawyer
Post Your Case
Post your case and have it reviewed by a highly respected attorney. NO Cost, NO obligation, NO Fees! Get started now »
Get Legal Forms
Download 36,000+ forms »


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:11 AM.

Contact Us - FreeAdvice - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top                                        


IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.