Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > GOVERNMENT & ADMINISTRATIVE LAW > US Supreme Court & The Constitution

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-03-2008, 12:17 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 183

11th Amendment and Commerce Clause


What is the name of your state? N/A, but for discussion Texas

The 11th Amendment prevents an individual from suing a state in federal court.

Quote:
The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.
Why are people allowed to sue states in federal court under Commerce Clause violation theories?

Example: Hughes v. Oklahoma

Thank you!
  #2  
Old 03-03-2008, 02:07 PM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 571
We don't do homework.
  #3  
Old 03-03-2008, 06:44 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeeHarveyBlotto View Post
We don't do homework.
If you think this is a homework question for a legal class, then you have undoubtedly never taken a legal class. Please don't waste time responding...
  #4  
Old 03-04-2008, 06:22 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,771
Quote:
Originally Posted by JakeB View Post
If you think this is a homework question for a legal class, then you have undoubtedly never taken a legal class. Please don't waste time responding...
Thanks, we'll take you up on that. no one will respond.
  #5  
Old 03-04-2008, 06:35 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by fairisfair View Post
Thanks, we'll take you up on that. no one will respond.
But you just did, and you did so with another unresponsive post. Yay.
  #6  
Old 03-04-2008, 06:48 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Odo of Cluny Parish
Posts: 29,043
Quote:
Originally Posted by JakeB View Post
But you just did, and you did so with another unresponsive post. Yay.
You are welcome.
__________________
There are two rules for success:

(1) Never tell everything you know.
  #7  
Old 03-04-2008, 07:01 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,771
Quote:
Originally Posted by JakeB View Post
But you just did, and you did so with another unresponsive post. Yay.
No I responded to your idiocy, not your question.
  #8  
Old 03-04-2008, 07:09 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,771
I will however give you this. Look up Filburn; Filbert, or is that Delbert? Ah, we will just stick with Jack A.


and only because you need something to occupy your time other than annoying people.

Last edited by fairisfair; 03-04-2008 at 07:32 PM.
  #9  
Old 03-04-2008, 07:41 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by fairisfair View Post
No I responded to your idiocy, not your question.
LOL. You got me there. Except I'll disagree that it was idiotic to call out Mr. Homework.
  #10  
Old 03-04-2008, 07:45 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,771
Quote:
Originally Posted by JakeB View Post
LOL. You got me there. Except I'll disagree that it was idiotic to call out Mr. Homework.
now run along and look up Filburn

by the way, we don't do homework, and that is a standard response. LeeHarvey was perfectly correct in giving it to you.
  #11  
Old 03-04-2008, 08:19 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by fairisfair View Post
now run along and look up Filburn
Thanks for trying, but I don't think Wickard v. Filburn answers my question. That case made it clear that the feds can regulate commerce, but it doesn't explain why a private party can sue a state in federal court for violating the Commerce Clause.

What I'm saying is that some of the Commcerce Clause cases seem contradictory to the 11th Amendment. The 11th Amendment states that an individual cannot sue a state in federal court. Why was Hughes allowed to sue Oklahoma in federal court?

Quote:
by the way, we don't do homework, and that is a standard response. LeeHarvey was perfectly correct in giving it to you.
It may be a standard response, but the assumption was not correct, and in my opinion there was no good reason to make that assumption.
  #12  
Old 03-05-2008, 01:17 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by JakeB View Post
Thanks for trying, but I don't think Wickard v. Filburn answers my question. That case made it clear that the feds can regulate commerce, but it doesn't explain why a private party can sue a state in federal court for violating the Commerce Clause.

What I'm saying is that some of the Commcerce Clause cases seem contradictory to the 11th Amendment. The 11th Amendment states that an individual cannot sue a state in federal court. Why was Hughes allowed to sue Oklahoma in federal court?
Well, after much research I finally figured out the answer.

Thanks anyway people.
  #13  
Old 03-11-2008, 12:23 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,548
Quote:
Originally Posted by JakeB View Post
But you just did, and you did so with another unresponsive post. Yay.
if it was unresponsive then she really didnt respond did she
  #14  
Old 03-11-2008, 06:18 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by VeronicaLodge View Post
if it was unresponsive then she really didnt respond did she
Unresponsive to the question.
  #15  
Old 03-11-2008, 06:24 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 21,653
Quote:
Originally Posted by JakeB View Post
Well, after much research I finally figured out the answer.

Thanks anyway people.
Sounds good - glad you found the help you needed!
__________________
*
*
The information I gave is based on my 7 seconds of research on Google. Review the information yourself to make an informed decision.

Communication is KEY - 10 mins of talking now can save you months of headaches later!

Masterfully stating the obvious to the oblivious! (Thanks SP!)

Tell it like it is! When all else fails, make up a statistic!

Gender references shall apply equally to the other gender. I will not correct gender mistakes (unless I want to)
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:20 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.