HOME LAW INSURANCE

Search      

Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > GOVERNMENT & ADMINISTRATIVE LAW > US Supreme Court & The Constitution
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



               


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-18-2007, 05:22 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1

condeming of property expo facto


What is the name of your state? Arkansas
My company ownes a mobile home park which was built in the late 50s to early 60s. The city passed an ordenance puting the mobile home parks in the town in class R7 which says that there can only be 8 mhs per acre. The problem is that, this park was built origonally with approx 12 per acre. It presently has MHs on 53 lots and the city is telling me that there can be no more homes added on the vacant lots. These vacant lots have all utilities at each pad and they have parking /patio pads all of which have exsisted since the park was built and the city is now after all these years condiming the vacant lots and not allowing them to be used, even though in years past all of them were occupied at one time or another. Does the expo facto law deal with this?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-18-2007, 06:55 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: "Harvey and Me"
Posts: 25,179
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larryc View Post
What is the name of your state? Arkansas
My company ownes a mobile home park which was built in the late 50s to early 60s. The city passed an ordenance puting the mobile home parks in the town in class R7 which says that there can only be 8 mhs per acre. The problem is that, this park was built origonally with approx 12 per acre. It presently has MHs on 53 lots and the city is telling me that there can be no more homes added on the vacant lots. These vacant lots have all utilities at each pad and they have parking /patio pads all of which have exsisted since the park was built and the city is now after all these years condiming the vacant lots and not allowing them to be used, even though in years past all of them were occupied at one time or another. Does the expo facto law deal with this?
This has nothing to do with Ex Post Facto or anything other than Grandfathering. If there were no mobile homes on the pads when the law was enacted, then no mobile homes can now be put on them.

It's not rocket science.
__________________
Just because I'm a miserable human being doesn't mean I'm not right...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-10-2007, 09:20 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: snowland
Posts: 5,978
So now you have a chance to begin to modify individual lot leases to be larger lots as leases come up for renewals, I wonder how many of your tenants would like to have a lot large enough to hold nice size garages? . If you wish to you could begin to make plans for increasing lot sizes as units vacate and eventually work it out so that larger manufactured homes can be placed. Too bad you werent able to act sooner before the local ord came in place, it would have been well worth it to attempt to fill those slots or combine side by side emptys and place double wide homes on them your self.

Last edited by FarmerJ; 03-10-2007 at 09:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



Find a Lawyer
Step 1:
Step 2:
 
Find a Lawyer
Post Your Case
Post your case and have it reviewed by a highly respected attorney. NO Cost, NO obligation, NO Fees! Get started now »
Get Legal Forms
Download 36,000+ forms »


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:11 PM.

Contact Us - FreeAdvice - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top                                        


IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.