discrimination

[Joe Jackson]

What is the name of your state? Michigan.

Jack and Diane

Two college students, Jack and Diane, had sexual intercourse on one occassion when Diane went to visit Jack for homework help. Foolishly, the kids didn't take pre-cautions, and an unplanned pregnancy was the result of their night of "studying."

Well, Jack, being from west-Michigan of course was an ardent member of the Christian reform church, and was thus inflamed when Diane suggested that she was close to graduating, had been accepted to law school, and did not want to go through with the pregnancy. Jack insisted that she had to go through with it, while Diane insisted that her plans were most important thing to her at that time. Besides, they barely knew each other, and the pregnancy was clearly a mistake.

Jack brought both of their parents into the situation, in an attempt to disuade Diane from her choice to abort the early pregnancy and continue with her plans to attend law school. However, Diane stood firm, arguing that neither of them were in a position to care for a child (nor wanted too), that her plans for law school, which she'd worked so hard towards, would have to be put on hold or completely junked, and further, that Jack (whom she barely knew) had no right to interferre with her life. She asserted that she had a right to choose.

Can Jack forcebly make Diane continue with the pregnancy? If so, is it not a violation of Diane's 14th Amendment rights, "Life, Liberty, and her pursuit of happiness?"

Now reverse the roles and view the synopsis in its usual format; On what grounds is a young woman more intitled to decide the outcome of her life, than a young man? When she decides to have a child, she decideds for herself and the young man. For the next 18 yrs of his life, she will not only have access to the young man's life, but is intitled to a portion of his wages. Shouldn't a young man have the right to at least choose to relinquish his rights to a child, in exchange for a suspension of child support?

Men should have just as much right as women to choose the controlable challenges in their lives. If not it's discrimination.

[Shay-Pari'e]

Originally Posted by Joe Jackson

What is the name of your state? Michigan.

Jack and Diane

Two college students, Jack and Diane, had sexual intercourse on one occassion when Diane went to visit Jack for homework help.How Exciting! Foolishly,

the kids didn't take pre-cautions,And you know this how?

and an unplanned pregnancy was the result of their night of "studying." DUH! How old are you?


Well, Jack, being from west-Michigan of course was an ardent member of the Christian reform church, and was thus inflamed when Diane suggested that she was close to graduating, had been accepted to law school, and did not want to go through with the pregnancy. What the hell does being from Michigan have anything to do with the right for her to choose?

Jack insisted that she had to go through with it, Jack is an idiot, he cannot insist anything.

while Diane insisted that her plans were most important thing to her at that time. Besides, they barely knew each other, and the pregnancy was clearly a mistake. And?

Jack brought both of their parents into the situation, in an attempt to disuade Diane from her choice to abort the early pregnancy and continue with her plans to attend law school. Jack is an IDIOT!

However, Diane stood firm, The only sane thing you posted!

arguing that neither of them were in a position to care for a child (nor wanted too), that her plans for law school, which she'd worked so hard towards, would have to be put on hold or completely junked, and further, that Jack (whom she barely knew) had no right to interferre with her life. She asserted that she had a right to choose. SHE IS RIGHT!
Can Jack forcebly make Diane continue with the pregnancy? NO!

If so, is it not a violation of Diane's 14th Amendment rights, The answer was NO."Life, Liberty, and her pursuit of happiness?"

Now reverse the roles and view the synopsis in its usual format; On what grounds is a young woman more intitled to decide the outcome of her life, than a young man? When she decides to have a child, she decideds for herself and the young man. For the next 18 yrs of his life, she will not only have access to the young man's life, but is intitled to a portion of his wages. Shouldn't a young man have the right to at least choose to relinquish his rights to a child, in exchange for a suspension of child support?

Men should have just as much right as women to choose the controlable challenges in their lives. If not it's discrimination.

Go do your homework some where else little one.

[Joe Jackson]

Then you agree that a woman does have more of a right to determine the outcome of her life than a man? Yes/no.

None of your comments were directed towards the real question? It's amazing how you said so much and so little at the same time.

[Shay-Pari'e]

[quote=Joe Jackson;1537822]Then you agree that a woman does have more of a right to determine the outcome of her life than a man? Yes/no.That would be a big YES. Why would a man be in charge of the outcome of my life?

None of your comments were directed towards the real question? It's amazing how you said so much and so little at the same time.

No, what's amazing is that you cannot comprehend the answers.

[Shay-Pari'e]

Well of course,[url]http://forum.freeadvice.com/showthread.php?t=348188[/url]

[fairisfair]

Originally Posted by Joe Jackson

Then you agree that a woman does have more of a right to determine the outcome of her life than a man? Yes/no.

None of your comments were directed towards the real question? It's amazing how you said so much and so little at the same time.

this has been discussed ad nauseum on the forum. Use your search feature if you would like to revisit this issue. Most of us will chose not to do so.

[Gadfly]

Jack, being a young man from the mid-west who clearly violated his upbringing by betraying a scared law and having intercourse out of wedlock should be forced to pay into eternity for not doing what he was taught to do.