HOME LAW INSURANCE

Search      

Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > GOVERNMENT & ADMINISTRATIVE LAW > US Supreme Court & The Constitution
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



               


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-09-2007, 07:18 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2
Wink

I am suing Los Angeles City for First Amendment Rights Violation


I am suing L.A. City in Pro Per and have received an answer from the City Attorney as follows: "any liability of defendant is barred by the provisions of California Government Code, sections 815 et seq., and other applicable provisions of law and each of them, in that any injury to Plaintiff's alleged in her complaint would have resulted from acts or ommissions of public employees (police) of this defendant, if at all, in the exercise of discretion vested in them."

Surely, Federal Law (ie. the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution) supersedes State Government Law and does not apply in this case.

Any suggestions on how to reply would be appreciated. Thanks.

BP
California

Last edited by bmpeck; 04-09-2007 at 07:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-09-2007, 07:46 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,018
If this one was hard for you to find an answer to, you have no business suing pro per. There will be many questions along the way. This was an easy one which you don't have to "answer". Many facts would need to be out to give you the answer, but you should be able to find one knowing all the facts. I assume this was one of the defenses in their answer, right? What were your cause(s) of action? This defense would only apply to some. If they have served you a demurer with this as the reason, you need to amend your complaint. (Or, ask to amend your complaint.)

But, again, give this up as it is going to drive you crazy. The answer is easy once you know all the facts, and no one in this forum will take the time to learn all the facts.
__________________
When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it.
--W. T. Pooh (aka A. A. Milne)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-10-2007, 12:05 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 456
Send a message via AIM to AlanShore
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmpeck View Post
I am suing L.A. City in Pro Per and have received an answer from the City Attorney as follows: "any liability of defendant is barred by the provisions of California Government Code, sections 815 et seq., and other applicable provisions of law and each of them, in that any injury to Plaintiff's alleged in her complaint would have resulted from acts or ommissions of public employees (police) of this defendant, if at all, in the exercise of discretion vested in them."

Surely, Federal Law (ie. the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution) supersedes State Government Law and does not apply in this case.

Any suggestions on how to reply would be appreciated. Thanks.

BP
California

Whats your cause of action?
__________________
''It's as simple as this. You don't get on the stand and say, 'I'm sorry for not doing the right thing.' You testify, 'I did the right thing!' That's how you win lawsuits. You're right! Even when you're wrong.''-Denny Crane
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-14-2007, 02:13 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: California
Posts: 15,751
Send a message via AIM to CdwJava Send a message via Yahoo to CdwJava
I believe it has to do with a lottery/permit system for space in a "free speech" zone on the Venice Beach walkway. Apparently a recent court hearing was dropped or cancelled - probably as a result of a successful move by the city.

The OP's profile has a link that has some of the information on it. Personally, I find the whole Venice Beach thing a humorous throwback to my childhood (the sight of hippies and peaceniks evokes memories of my youth) and something of a nuisance. However, there are many peopl that find the atmosphere to be unique and have a great love for it. To each their own.

Having not read up on the ordinance in question, I have no opinion one way or the other. But, I'd venture to guess things were getting out of hand so the city decided to take the walkway back and this was one (so far, lawful) means of doing so.

- Carl
__________________
A Nor Cal. Cop Supervisor
"Make mine a double mocha ... and a croissant!"

Remember, only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you: Jesus Christ and the American Soldier. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



Find a Lawyer
Step 1:
Step 2:
 
Find a Lawyer
Post Your Case
Post your case and have it reviewed by a highly respected attorney. NO Cost, NO obligation, NO Fees! Get started now »
Get Legal Forms
Download 36,000+ forms »


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35 AM.

Contact Us - FreeAdvice - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top                                        


IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.