![]() |
| ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| |||||||
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Vacation Payout Upon LayoffWhat is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Indiana I am asking this question for verification only, as I believe I already know the answer. Indiana does not have a law requiring employers to pay vacation earned upon laying off an employee, correct? My husband was recently laid off after 7 years with his company, and they only paid out 2/3 of his vacation. I thought it was pretty classless (though not surprising), but from the information I have found thus far, it seems he was lucky to have received anything. Thank you for your help. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Not exactly. Quote:
__________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nobody understands good sarcasm any more. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Thank you. He did receive his pro-rated vacation balance, so this helps me feel a little less bitter. ![]() |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Just to be clear, when you say 2/3, what exactly do you mean?
__________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nobody understands good sarcasm any more. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| He was paid for approximately 2/3 of his vacation balance. Apparently, they figured how many hours he'd worked in the year, then figured how many hours of vacation he earned from this, and paid this amount. I guess his vacation had been awarded in advance at the beginning of each year that he worked for the company. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| OK, then that would be correct, assuming he had no untaken vacation carryover from the previous year.
__________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nobody understands good sarcasm any more. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| If he'd worked 2/3 of the year then he was paid out ALL of his vacation balance. Most (and probably all) employers accrue their employees' vacation time, and many employees don't quite get this concept. So when the employer says "this year you will have 10 days' vacation" the employee takes this to mean "you have 10 days' vacation in your vacation bank right now" when the employer really means "you will accrue 10 days' vacation over the course of this year" - and this misunderstanding causes problems when employees are let go. If your husband's former employer is at all like most employers with regard to vacation time and pay, then your husband was actually paid out in full. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| As I said, IF he didn't have any carryover from the previous year.
__________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nobody understands good sarcasm any more. |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Agreed. I was still typing when you said that. |
![]() |