What is the name of your state? New York
I have a question about the workings of AB trusts. In this example the father owns a $2million house and about $.7 million in stocks. He dies in 2007. The house will pass into the "B" Family trust which is ultimately designed to go to his two children tax free representing the entire estate tax exemption, while the remaining $.7million passes into the 'A' Marital trust which goes to support his surviving wife.
In this example, lets say the house is sold shortly after the father is
deceased by the successor trustee who takes over when the father dies. Lets say the purchase price of the house back in 1985 was $.5million, so that there is a potential capital gains tax hit of 2million - .5million = 1.5million x 15% = $225,000. The question is, who pays this capital gains tax and when; is it the 'A' trust which owns the house at the time of sale which must pay the tax which would lessen the inherited amount of the children?
In this case, for the children to get the full benefit of the $2million
estate exclusion, wouldnt it be better for the house to be sold before it passed into the 'A' trust so that the full exclusion amount could be
utilized and made up by his stock holdings? For instance, if the house was sold while he was alive, fetching a net value of $2million - $225,000 (capital gains amount) = $1,775,000, then an additional $225,000 of his stocks could be incorporated into the 'A' trust so that the kids could get the benefit of the full $2million exclusion.
Is this a correct analysis? Or should the property be sold first, and then the the proceeds could fund the 'B' trust, and if capital gains taxes brings the amount to below the exclusion amount ($2million), then additional funds from his remaining $.7million could be combined with the net house sale proceeds to make sure a full $2million is used to fund the B trust?
thank you.
I have a question about the workings of AB trusts. In this example the father owns a $2million house and about $.7 million in stocks. He dies in 2007. The house will pass into the "B" Family trust which is ultimately designed to go to his two children tax free representing the entire estate tax exemption, while the remaining $.7million passes into the 'A' Marital trust which goes to support his surviving wife.
In this example, lets say the house is sold shortly after the father is
deceased by the successor trustee who takes over when the father dies. Lets say the purchase price of the house back in 1985 was $.5million, so that there is a potential capital gains tax hit of 2million - .5million = 1.5million x 15% = $225,000. The question is, who pays this capital gains tax and when; is it the 'A' trust which owns the house at the time of sale which must pay the tax which would lessen the inherited amount of the children?
In this case, for the children to get the full benefit of the $2million
estate exclusion, wouldnt it be better for the house to be sold before it passed into the 'A' trust so that the full exclusion amount could be
utilized and made up by his stock holdings? For instance, if the house was sold while he was alive, fetching a net value of $2million - $225,000 (capital gains amount) = $1,775,000, then an additional $225,000 of his stocks could be incorporated into the 'A' trust so that the kids could get the benefit of the full $2million exclusion.
Is this a correct analysis? Or should the property be sold first, and then the the proceeds could fund the 'B' trust, and if capital gains taxes brings the amount to below the exclusion amount ($2million), then additional funds from his remaining $.7million could be combined with the net house sale proceeds to make sure a full $2million is used to fund the B trust?
thank you.