![]() |
| ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| |||||||
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
California probate codeSECTION 250-259What is the name of your state? California [url]http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cacodes/prob/250-259.html[/url] In the case where a husband and wife own proprty in joint tenancy with right of survivorship and one tenant is convicted of intentionally murdering the other tenant. Does the murderer retain his 50% of the property or does he lose 100% of his rights to the property? Please email your response to [email]buizman10@aol.com[/email] or post here. Thank you |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Is this your homework assignment or are you really interested? |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| I'm really interested. Its a question that has come up on a discussion of the Laci Peterson case. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Although IAAL is the California authority on this forum, I don't know if he'll respond since this is only a discussion and not a 'real' issue. However, my reading of the statute is that nowhere in the statute does it mention that the 'killer' gives up his/her right to their own property rights under law. Only that they give up all claim to their share of any legal claim of the deceased. |
![]() |