W
wwwizard
Guest
What is the name of your state?Missouri My widowed mother is 73 and lives in Missouri. She owns no real estate and her estate will be less than $1M. I have two sisters: good sister (GS) and evil sister (ES). Currently, I am executor of her will (which I wrote), have durable POA, and am JTWRS on her accounts. Her car is titled TOD to GS (who also lives in MO) and her IRA/life ins. have beneficiary statements on file. Her 'probate' estate contains only clothes, furniture and household goods (junk, basically) worth $3-4k at most. The will calls for each heir to get 1/3, and I can and will make this happen. Where the problem arises is that Mom wants to eliminate or drastically reduce ES's share from a third. Logic says I can't be the author of this change due to the appearance of undue influence. (Truth is that I have used undue influence from 1999-2001 to get her to keep it equal, but the last couple of years I've grown tired of it. After all, it is her money.) So I am looking at having a MO attorney do something. The questions is: What? I'm getting conflicting input. I firmly believe this change will result in a contest from ES. Some sources say that if you know your will is going to be contested, you must have a living trust. Others say that a living trust can be contested for undue influence just as easily as a will. Can a joint tenancy be contested for undue influence? Even if it has been in place for 8 years? Can a new beneficiary statement be contested? What are the chances of such contests being upheld? Is the clause in a will that says 'you get nothing if you contest this will', ironclad or contestable? Would a living trust really make any difference? What can Mom do while she's still alive to prove that these are really her wishes? TIA wiz