What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Calif.
My MIL passed away recently and had a living trust drawn up by her attorney in 2005. In the trust she leaves all her assets including her home to her two siblings (my wife and her brother).
After having her trust written she opened up an equity line of credit for $250,000.00 limit through her mortgage company (b of a)
This was never entered into her trust, but it is secured by the equity in her home, which was paid off in 1999.
Her home is worth approximately 575K
When she passed away she left a $182,000.00 debt on her line of credit which she had been paying on since 2006. This debt wasn't entered into her trust.
Also in her trust she made it clear that it was to be a fair and equal division between siblings.
My wife looked into where the 182k was spent and found that her brother had received money many times from his mother, all against her house through the line of credit. That total over the years is approximately 170K, with the remaining 12K she used fixing up her house. Two of the amounts were over 150K. One for a boat (30K) and one for a down payment on a house (120K).
My question is, is my wife responsible for half of the 170K debt given to her brother even though she didn't benefit from it directly or indirectly? I know she is liable for the remaining 12K.
Thanks.
My MIL passed away recently and had a living trust drawn up by her attorney in 2005. In the trust she leaves all her assets including her home to her two siblings (my wife and her brother).
After having her trust written she opened up an equity line of credit for $250,000.00 limit through her mortgage company (b of a)
This was never entered into her trust, but it is secured by the equity in her home, which was paid off in 1999.
Her home is worth approximately 575K
When she passed away she left a $182,000.00 debt on her line of credit which she had been paying on since 2006. This debt wasn't entered into her trust.
Also in her trust she made it clear that it was to be a fair and equal division between siblings.
My wife looked into where the 182k was spent and found that her brother had received money many times from his mother, all against her house through the line of credit. That total over the years is approximately 170K, with the remaining 12K she used fixing up her house. Two of the amounts were over 150K. One for a boat (30K) and one for a down payment on a house (120K).
My question is, is my wife responsible for half of the 170K debt given to her brother even though she didn't benefit from it directly or indirectly? I know she is liable for the remaining 12K.
Thanks.