davidmcbeth3
Senior Member
Whether you get violated or not will depend on whether the PO buys this tale of yours.
Yes, if he does let me know his name ... I have some ocean front property for sale
Whether you get violated or not will depend on whether the PO buys this tale of yours.
The device does not have a LCD readout or anything but it does record the result (they are set for ~0.04 for a positive reading for the machine). The device log is downloaded when being re-calibrated.
Search the net for your specific model's cut-off point.
And yes, it does sound unbelievable ; hence your problem, even you acknowledge that.
The process works like any other probation violation. You could have a big issue ahead.
Post back with your results..but most who post interlock device issues & posted on this forum never do so I assume that the outcome for most is not favorable.
woodykas;2772137 said:not sure about Texas, but in Utah, Salt Lake County - PO definitely will ask you for EtG UA ASAP even for first time violation. so, the is only three options:
1) you passed UA - "interlock failure" will be accepted.
2) you failed UA - you are in deep hole ...
3) you failed to report this ASAP - see number 2.
if your probabtion terms are for you not to drink at all during this period, you are in for a probation violation regardless.thanks for your advice but i have one problem about telling PO immediataly if you say she will ask for etg. I have drank in the last 5 days actually the day before this incident occurred and im not suppose to be drinking . So Im thinking Id better wait a few days before telling her to prevent from having two violations if she doesnt wanna beleieve. I would think i could hire an attorney on probation violation to argue the accuracy of device which i see alot. Cant argue a positive UA. UR thoughts?
Fixed it for you.you story won't mouthwash.
no you didn't.Fixed it for you.
Okay... so you ARE drinking again.thanks for your advice but i have one problem about telling PO immediataly if you say she will ask for etg. I have drank in the last 5 days actually the day before this incident occurred and im not suppose to be drinking . So Im thinking Id better wait a few days before telling her to prevent from having two violations if she doesnt wanna beleieve. I would think i could hire an attorney on probation violation to argue the accuracy of device which i see alot. Cant argue a positive UA. UR thoughts?
Actually, depending on the device, it can register a false positive (methane gas generated as a result of the spicy food mixing with HCL (Hydrochloric acid) in the stomach)...Spicy pizza..,or spicy food ...will NOT cause an Interlock Device to "go off".
Just won't.
i have heard of this situation. however, OP won't be able to use this possible argument since he HAD been drinking. doing a blood test or UA now will have positive results.Actually, depending on the device, it can register a false positive (methane gas generated as a result of the spicy food mixing with HCL (Hydrochloric acid) in the stomach)...
Based on the person (that I questioned) who had a first hand experience with InterLock...Nope.Actually, depending on the device, it can register a false positive (methane gas generated in the stomach as a result of the spicy food mixing with HCL (Hydrochloric acid) in the stomach)...
No argument thereOP is looking for an "out".
I LOVE to agree. Thanks!!No argument there
Agreed... It would also be safe to assume that he was given some sort of instruction/warning sheet (that is specific to the unit he had installed) with regards to what may trigger it or not...i have heard of this situation. however, OP won't be able to use this possible argument since he HAD been drinking. doing a blood test or UA now will have positive results.
he's in a catch 22. no matter what, he's in violation.