British Chris
Junior Member
How often have you been to Auschwitz?How often do you attend this church, Chris?
How often have you been to Auschwitz?How often do you attend this church, Chris?
It was the mother's confession during her rant, incombination with descriptions by the two eldest daughters.Again, what evidence of this naked butt whipping do you have other than the girl's description?
How often have you been to Auschwitz?
and that means what? Did you see the girls injured rear end or not? If not, all you have is some unsupported statements. If she is being whipped, she needs to call the police. They are not going to leave her in such a situation if there is proof of the abuse and yes, even if the church preaches the action, it is considered abuse.It was the mother's confession during her rant, incombination with descriptions by the two eldest daughters.
The point of my post was that I don't have to visit the place to know what goes on there. I was going to say "how many times have you been to the Gulag" but then thought fewer people would get the reference. So, no, it's not Godwin's Law.Really? The step before Godwin's Law takes over? (Yes, you'll probably have to Google that).
Well, here we are. A 4-page thread, and the author has absolutely no legal standing to do anything at all. It is simply not his legal matter. And now we're back to Godwin's Law.
Really.
Is it a full moon?
but if you have not seen the murders first hand or at least the bodies, all you have is somebody saying it happened. We have proof the murders in Auschwitz took place, much more than mere testimony. What proof beyond testimony from a subjective observer do you have that the girl was abused?The point of my post was that I don't have to visit the place to know what goes on there. I was going to say "how many times have you been to the Gulag" but then thought fewer people would get the reference. So, no, it's not Godwin's Law.
Why do our courtrooms have witness boxes?but if you have not seen the murders first hand or at least the bodies, all you have is somebody saying it happened. We have proof the murders in Auschwitz took place, much more than mere testimony. What proof beyond testimony from a subjective observer do you have that the girl was abused?
There is no way that we're going to change this OP's mind. I'm out.
Were you really pretending to think I was comparing a bunch of frumpy bigots with the SS?Really? The step before Godwin's Law takes over? (Yes, you'll probably have to Google that).
...
And now we're back to Godwin's Law.
... which is what we did.If the kid is being abused, call the police and/or child services.
how many convictions do think there are with absolutely no physical evidence and only testimony of an involved party?Why do our courtrooms have witness boxes?
then they apparently did not see abuse... which is what we did.