Hello Zigner.
Actually I would do that only if it is necessary, I mean, if there's no another way.
I will not copy his words, pages, trades, etc.
I will use informations available to everyone and put in a model, for example:
Someone is selling a course to teach people how to do dribbles in soccer.
Everyone knows that to do a dribble in soccer, you need speed and pretend to go to one place and go to another one, in front of an opponent.
The course tell this, with these words:
To dribble, you should:
1) run for 5 steps in the direction of your opponent
2) pass your right foot over the ball to the right, without touch the ball;
3) When your opponent advance, go to the side he is not.
4) Try to take the ball out of his physical range.
You understand? He took something very well known by general public (how to drible), but putted in details, in a kind of detailed strategy, or detailed idea.
So, I readed that, and I noticed how to improve the system.
Then I did a course telling it:
1) run 4-6 steps in the direction of your opponent, while he is not running.
2) not pretend that you go to the right just passing your foot over the ball, but not move it.
3) if your opponent:
a) Advance to you by your right: Go to the left with the ball. The ball should not be on his physical reach.
b) Advance to you by your left: Go to the right with the ball. The ball should not be on his physical reach.
c) Not advance to you at all: Pass the ball to someone of your team.
As you can see, I used something that general public know, that to drible you need to pretend, but I putted in details, making another detailed strategy or idea.
Can you see the difference? If I did something similar, it would be ok? Or I would be infriging his copyright?
If yes, what should I do to keep it away from copyright infrigement?
Thank you a lot!!!