I read them:
1942.6:
Any person entering onto residential real property, upon the invitation of an occupant, during reasonable hours or because of emergency circumstances, for the purpose of providing information regarding tenants' rights or to participate in a lessees' association or association of tenants or an association that advocates tenants' rights shall not be liable in any criminal or civil action for trespass.
The Legislature finds and declares that this section is declaratory of existing law. Nothing in this section shall be construed to enlarge or diminish the rights of any person under existing law.
This concerns an owner or manager not interfering or retaliating against a tenant for participating an association, it does NOT confer any special rights to the association not already afforded a tenant.
And,
1942.5(c):
It is unlawful for a lessor to increase rent, decrease services, cause a lessee to quit involuntarily, bring an action to recover possession, or threaten to do any of those acts, for the purpose of retaliating against the lessee because he or she has lawfully organized or participated in a lessees' association or an organization advocating lessees' rights or has lawfully and peaceably exercised any rights under the law. In an action brought by or against the lessee pursuant to this subdivision, the lessee shall bear the burden of producing evidence that the lessor's conduct was, in fact, retaliatory.
Same thing.
Those sections allow the tenant(s) to organize and prohibit an owner or manager from retaliating because of that membership or their participation. They do NOT grant ANY special rights that a tenant does not already possess.
Perhaps you might consider educating yourself by reading the sections, first.