The series of posts by Curenton within a very short period of time at least serve to show how desperate Curenton is to find answers. A divorce after 22 years of marriage has no doubt shaken up her world.OP, this forum doesn't use a live chat program - the posters will respond in good time. Could you please try to put your comments and answers in the same post going forward? That'd really help us help you more
Perhaps the OP missed this question...I'm curious - did you know about the divorce and just not know the date of the hearing?
YOU need an attorney. Should have gotten? Alimony is NOT a guarantee.Please Will somebody tell me how I can go back to court and fight for what I should have gotten
Totally unaware of itPerhaps the OP missed this question...
Curenton: Were you served with papers and just didn't realize that the hearing was on that day?
OR, were you totally unaware of the divorce?
When you hire an attorney, the attorney will ask you questions. You should be prepared to answer them.Totally unaware of it
How did you find out you were divorced then?Totally unaware of it
If the other party had an attorney and was aware of falsified service, it could lead to ethical concerns I suppose. It could also be considered malpractice (but not in so far as the OP is concerned)... and what does this thread have to do with legal ethics and lawyer malpractice?
Right. But the questions I asked earlier about attorney involvement have been ignored by Curenton - as have most of the questions asked of Curenton by the forum members.If the other party had an attorney and was aware of falsified service, it could lead to ethical concerns I suppose. It could also be considered malpractice (but not in so far as the OP is concerned)
I definitely agree with you. Even if her responses were more on-point, her matter really needs the assistance of an attorney.Right. But the questions I asked earlier about attorney involvement have been ignored by Curenton - as have most of the questions asked of Curenton by the forum members.
The bottom line is that Curenton will want an attorney in her area to assist her. I don't see that her responses here are leading us anywhere helpful.
I hope SHE understands that.I definitely agree with you. Even if her responses were more on-point, her matter really needs the assistance of an attorney.
That's the scary part. She is so scattered... She might have a point, legally, but a lawyer would need to be saintly patient with her.I definitely agree with you. Even if her responses were more on-point, her matter really needs the assistance of an attorney.