No renter INS. But I like the thread about dix that sounds plasable!What about your renter's insurance?
The renter's insurance covers you for liability too. It would be really strange if it didn't.
No renter INS. But I like the thread about dix that sounds plasable!What about your renter's insurance?
The renter's insurance covers you for liability too. It would be really strange if it didn't.
My bad thought all they covered was contents,anyway moot point seeing no INS.What about your renter's insurance?
The renter's insurance covers you for liability too. It would be really strange if it didn't.
And I do want to thank all for the help !!No renter INS. But I like the thread about dix that sounds plasable!
It's the DuPlessis decision that applies since you have no lease. Though Dix is the basis for DuPlessis.no INS.
Believe me the attorney already knows about that decision. What you would be letting the attorney know, is that you ALSO know about that decision.was wondering if I send them that would that give them something to plot a defence against it? don't know if showing hand would be a good idea?
OK,is how they figure negligence going to be a problem ? And if they already know why would they pursue it then?Believe me the attorney already knows about that decision. What you would be letting the attorney know, is that you ALSO know about that decision.
Also do I need to get a lawyer for this?Believe me the attorney already knows about that decision. What you would be letting the attorney know, is that you ALSO know about that decision.
Because they were hoping that you didn't know it or wouldn't know how to use it.OK,is how they figure negligence going to be a problem ? And if they already know why would they pursue it then?
With that much money involved, having an attorney would be a good idea.Also do I need to get a lawyer for this?
Yea kinda thought that after postingBecause they were hoping that you didn't know it or wouldn't know how to use it.
OK,um how much money would getting a atterney run for something like this,a ballpark figureWith that much money involved, having an attorney would be a good idea.
You have nothing to lose. Besides, the decision is very clear.was wondering if I send them that would that give them something to plot a defence against it? don't know if showing hand would be a good idea?
Because for the amount of money involved all they need is an allegation and fear to get the victim to agree to payments. Until they file a lawsuit, they don't have to prove anything.OK,is how they figure negligence going to be a problem ? And if they already know why would they pursue it then?
Couldn't hurt. But at this point, take a shot without one and see how it goes. You won't be any worse off if you need one later.Also do I need to get a lawyer for this?
Liability defense lawyers charge about $300 per hour. It could run into many thousands if it goes to trial.OK,um how much money would getting a atterney run for something like this,a ballpark figure
you know what is funny the landlord /tenant subrogation in all 50 states has in its illinois statute ie., sutton rule autoowners ins. company a/s/a john ellis v. thomas callaghan 953 N.E. 2d 119 (Ill.App.2011) is the same insurance company that is trying to get money from me