• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Can I sue my personal trainer for loss for membership fees?

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

Status
Not open for further replies.

missyj98

Member
I am in Cincinnati Ohio. Sorry for the long explanation, but being a former court reporter and paralegal, I know the more information that is given the better:

I hired a personal trainer in 2015. I was not required to join the gym in which he trained me. I trained with him 6 days a week for 1 hour long sessions at the set time of 8 am. This is where it gets tricky. There was another girl and her husband that went there that trained with the same trainer, they were, however, members of the gym. For whatever reasons she saw fit, she started a lot of gym drama by talking about me. I never did anything about her gossip. One day someone at the gym started telling me the things she said and I made a comment, not really anything mean but said she needed to worry about her own business and stay out of mine. Her husband was basically stalking another female trainer there and I commented on it. It got back to the girl that was doing the gossiping and she cornered me in the locker room. I told her to leave me alone and all would be fine. At this point it got worse. It went from gossip to bullying, where she would make derogatory statements under her breath to me directly. The owner was fully aware of the conflict as well, and he witnessed her husband yelling at me in the middle of the gym floor in front of several people in which the husband of gossip girl called me, "a white trash C*nt. The gym owner did absolutely nothing. Even when I turned around and said "are you really going to let this continue? Some time went on and I continued on, but another girl, a member and a trainer at this gym got into a heated verbal altercation with the gossip girl, at which time the gossip girl decided she was not going to stay and cancelled her membership. So now she no longer goes to the gym and everything is quiet for a few months. Then out of the blue in February of 2017, gossip girl, who is no longer a member at this gym puts up a FB post about me and a screenshot of a comment I had made, in which the owner of the gym saw it, and told me I could not come to the gym anymore to train. My trainer was fully aware of the issues and not once did he speak to the owner of the gym, nor did the owner of the gym ask me about any thing that was said or done.

Here is my dilemma: In February of 2017 My trainer told me to join another gym, which was way out of my way of travel and he would train me at that gym, He was already a member at this gym and it was about 8 minutes travel from the original gym I was training at. Key point, I had to join and pay extra to train there. In joining I had to sign a 2 year contract, which I read and fully understood. Before joining I asked my trainer, via text message, if this would be a problem, that I did not want to sign a contract if he wasn't committed, in which he replied "I'm in it for the long haul, there will be no problems." Unfortunately from the get go scheduling was a problem. He had to fit me in and would constantly be late, cancel or not show up because he forgot about my appointment. Finally after about 2 months of this, he gave me a set time of 2:15 everyday. I have that as a text also in which he states he didn't know why he didn't think of it sooner to put me as his last appointment of the day. I want to point out, that he was also a member of this gym so being his last appointment of the day should have posed no conflict for him. His excuses got more and more frequent and a friend of mine whom he also trained, messaged me and told me to beware, that the trainer had made a comment about "trimming the fat" from his schedule. He had started an online training company. Then in August 2017 I got the text, he was not going to train me anymore due to a conflict in scheduling and travel. I continued to go for about a month but the travel was inconvenient so I went to another gym. Now I am stuck paying the gym membership of $53 for 2 years at a gym I will not be using. The only reason I joined that particular gym was because he was a member, they were willing to let me pay extra for his training. Had it not been for that, I would have never joined. There were gyms that were closer to me that had the same equipment and time availability. I was also told by a staff member at this particular gym that the trainer had his membership revoked due to derogatory statements he had made in one of his online training videos on Facebook, which leads me to believe this is also the reason he stopped training me.
I have since paid for the gym membership in full and cancelled it.
I have every text message that the trainer sent me, including but not limited to him not showing up, him being late and him cancelling appointments at the last minute.
First: would this be considered a legal binding written contract since all communications about joining the gym were via text message?
Second: Can I sue the trainer for the total cost of the gym membership, which was roughly around $3,000?
Third: If I can sue the trainer for the total cost of the gym membership, can I sue him for anything else?
 
Last edited:


Shadowbunny

Queen of the Not-Rights
I am in Cincinnati Ohio. Sorry for the long explanation, but being a former court reporter and paralegal, I know the more information that is given the better:

I hired a personal trainer in 2015. I was not required to join the gym in which he trained me. I trained with him 6 days a week for 1 hour long sessions at the set time of 8 am. This is where it gets tricky. There was another girl and her husband that went there that trained with the same trainer, they were, however, members of the gym. For whatever reasons she saw fit, she started a lot of gym drama by talking about me. I never did anything about her gossip. One day someone at the gym started telling me the things she said and I made a comment, not really anything mean but said she needed to worry about her own business and stay out of mine. Her husband was basically stalking another female trainer there and I commented on it. It got back to the girl that was doing the gossiping and she cornered me in the locker room. I told her to leave me alone and all would be fine. At this point it got worse. It went from gossip to bullying, where she would make derogatory statements under her breath to me directly. The owner was fully aware of the conflict as well, and he witnessed her husband yelling at me in the middle of the gym floor in front of several people in which the husband of gossip girl called me, "a white trash C*nt. The gym owner did absolutely nothing. Even when I turned around and said "are you really going to let this continue? Some time went on and I continued on, but another girl, a member and a trainer at this gym got into a heated verbal altercation with the gossip girl, at which time the gossip girl decided she was not going to stay and cancelled her membership. So now she no longer goes to the gym and everything is quiet for a few months. Then out of the blue in February of 2017, gossip girl, who is no longer a member at this gym puts up a FB post about me and a screenshot of a comment I had made, in which the owner of the gym saw it, and told me I could not come to the gym anymore to train. My trainer was fully aware of the issues and not once did he speak to the owner of the gym, nor did the owner of the gym ask me about any thing that was said or done.

Here is my dilemma: In February of 2017 My trainer told me to join another gym, which was way out of my way of travel and he would train me at that gym, He was already a member at this gym and it was about 8 minutes travel from the original gym I was training at. Key point, I had to join and pay extra to train there. In joining I had to sign a 2 year contract, which I read and fully understood. Before joining I asked my trainer, via text message, if this would be a problem, that I did not want to sign a contract if he wasn't committed, in which he replied "I'm in it for the long haul, there will be no problems." Unfortunately from the get go scheduling was a problem. He had to fit me in and would constantly be late, cancel or not show up because he forgot about my appointment. Finally after about 2 months of this, he gave me a set time of 2:15 everyday. I have that as a text also in which he states he didn't know why he didn't think of it sooner to put me as his last appointment of the day. I want to point out, that he was also a member of this gym so being his last appointment of the day should have posed no conflict for him. His excuses got more and more frequent and a friend of mine whom he also trained, messaged me and told me to beware, that the trainer had made a comment about "trimming the fat" from his schedule. He had started an online training company. Then in August 2017 I got the text, he was not going to train me anymore due to a conflict in scheduling and travel. I continued to go for about a month but the travel was inconvenient so I went to another gym. Now I am stuck paying the gym membership of $53 for 2 years at a gym I will not be using. The only reason I joined that particular gym was because he was a member, they were willing to let me pay extra for his training. Had it not been for that, I would have never joined. There were gyms that were closer to me that had the same equipment and time availability. I was also told by a staff member at this particular gym that the trainer had his membership revoked due to derogatory statements he had made in one of his online training videos on Facebook, which leads me to believe this is also the reason he stopped training me.
I have since paid for the gym membership in full and cancelled it.
I have every text message that the trainer sent me, including but not limited to him not showing up, him being late and him cancelling appointments at the last minute.
First: would this be considered a legal binding written contract since all communications about joining the gym were via text message?
Second: Can I sue the trainer for the total cost of the gym membership, which was roughly around $3,000?
Third: If I can sue the trainer for the total cost of the gym membership, can I sue him for anything else?
So the bottom line is that you got involved in some drama at your gym and were asked to not go there anymore.

The trainer you were working with asked you to go to another gym. You agreed. Then he cut you from his schedule. But then it became inconvenient for you to continue at that gym, and joined a third gym. And you want the trainer to pay for your membership at the second gym? Under what legal theory do you think he'd be responsible for you deciding it was inconvenient for you to go to second gym?
 

LdiJ

Senior Member
So the bottom line is that you got involved in some drama at your gym and were asked to not go there anymore.

The trainer you were working with asked you to go to another gym. You agreed. Then he cut you from his schedule. But then it became inconvenient for you to continue at that gym, and joined a third gym. And you want the trainer to pay for your membership at the second gym? Under what legal theory do you think he'd be responsible for you deciding it was inconvenient for you to go to second gym?
She did talk to him and tell him that she did not want to commit to the new gym he recommended without assurances and he assured her that he was in it for the long haul. That could possibly be considered a verbal contract. However I do not see where he could possibly owe her any more than the cost of finishing her contract with that gym. That wouldn't more than about 900.00 or so dollars for the 18 months she had left to go at that gym when he pulled the rug out from under her.
 

Zigner

Senior Member, Non-Attorney
She did talk to him and tell him that she did not want to commit to the new gym he recommended without assurances and he assured her that he was in it for the long haul. That could possibly be considered a verbal contract.
Define: Long Haul
 

missyj98

Member
Shadowbunny, I'm guessing you did not read the entire post, nothing you said even comes close to what I said. my trainer was fully aware from the beginning the gym HE chose was farther away from me, but he was a member there. Where as LDiJ seemed to read it. Let me shed some light onto the issue at hand. I am a bodybuilding competitor, had been doing it for 2 years and had several competitions coming up. my membership fees were $53 per month. I'm not sure it if would be verbal or written, as the conversation was via text message. So in our definition "long haul" would be he would train me through out my time as a competitor. I hired him as my trainer since the majority of his clients were also bodybuilding competitors, all of which were women and he was also a competitor himself. Was he a specialist in women's bodybuilding competitions, I don't know, but the majority of his clients aside from maybe 3 were all competitors. When he stopped training me, I was 2 weeks out from a major competition. Now this may not seem like much to some, but these competitions cost a lot of money. Travel, hotel, entry fees, makeup, hair, stage suits, etc, can cost upwards of $800 or more. I wanted to continue to train with him, so I was willing to join the gym of his choice, but only as long as he was going to continue to train me for the duration of my competitions. Let me make something clear which I believe I already stated, I was not a member of the gym he trained me at. I was told by him as long as He was my trainer, I had use of the gym. He had worked out some type of business deal with the owner on that. I already belonged to Planet fitness, it was closer. This is also something that my trainer was aware of. HE was a member at the gym he had me join. I specifically told him that if he wasn't going to be able to train me in the same manner as he was hired, 6 days a week 1 hour a day, I did not want to make the commitment to his gym because it was farther for me to drive, at which time he stated there would be no problem, to go ahead and join. He was in it for the "long haul", So as I stated "long haul" meant to me as long as it took. Would I have this issue if it would have been some other problem of him stopping training me such as family problems or a change in profession. No, I would not, but he up and quit stating that travel and scheduling were a problem. He set the schedule, he chose the gym, so It would be a fair assumption to say that he thought it through as far as the travel and schedule, and again, he was a member of this gym, so I was willing to adhere to whatever times he set to train me, I was the one that had to rearrange my schedule. Again, all of this was communicated via text message.
 
Last edited:

Zigner

Senior Member, Non-Attorney
In this scenario, the two years that was required for the gym contract.
Really - not until the OP achieved the results s/he is looking for?
The problem with "long haul" is that it is vague and undefined.
 

LdiJ

Senior Member
Really - not until the OP achieved the results s/he is looking for?
The problem with "long haul" is that it is vague and undefined.
Sorry, but in this instance I believe that an argument can be made for the long haul to be defined as the 2 year period of the gym membership, since that was the specific thing discussed.
 

Zigner

Senior Member, Non-Attorney
Sorry, but in this instance I believe that an argument can be made for the long haul to be defined as the 2 year period of the gym membership, since that was the specific thing discussed.
Oh, I agree that an argument can be made for that, but I think we differ on the strength of that argument ;)
 

missyj98

Member
Really - not until the OP achieved the results s/he is looking for?
The problem with "long haul" is that it is vague and undefined.
if I were going by your definition of "long haul" that would have been indefinitely because as a bodybuilding competitor, you are always striving for results. There is no end in sight unless you get seriously injured, get sick or die. it could be getting a first place trophy, it could be achieving a pro card at which time you can enter national competitions that you see on TV and win money, it could actually be trying to make a career of it as Arnold, Lou Ferigno, Corrie Everson, and so many have done.
 

Zigner

Senior Member, Non-Attorney
if I were going by your definition of "long haul" that would have been indefinitely because as a bodybuilding competitor, you are always striving for results. There is no end in sight unless you get seriously injured, get sick or die. it could be getting a first place trophy, it could be achieving a pro card at which time you can enter national competitions that you see on TV and win money, it could actually be trying to make a career of it as Arnold, Lou Ferigno, Corrie Everson, and so many have done.
Sure - but what does it mean to the other party? If it doesn't mean the same thing, then you have no "meeting of the minds".
 

Just Blue

Senior Member
if I were going by your definition of "long haul" that would have been indefinitely because as a bodybuilding competitor, you are always striving for results. There is no end in sight unless you get seriously injured, get sick or die. it could be getting a first place trophy, it could be achieving a pro card at which time you can enter national competitions that you see on TV and win money, it could actually be trying to make a career of it as Arnold, Lou Ferigno, Corrie Everson, and so many have done.
Did you have a contract other than a vague "long haul" comment? Did you make sure the trainers idea of "long haul" was the same as yours?
 

missyj98

Member
Did you have a contract other than a vague "long haul" comment? Did you make sure the trainers idea of "long haul" was the same as yours?
He was fully aware of my intentions to continue to build and continue to compete. He was also fully aware that I didn't want to sign a 2 year contract if he was not going to continue to train me for that duration. In a text I found I specifically stated "I don't want to be stuck in a 2 year contract if you are going to have any difficulties training me for my competitions at ABC Gym (not real gym name). I have no problem joining other than that" and his response was "No worries, MJ (my initials), I am in it for the long haul, everything has been taken care of on my end. Go ahead and join"
 

Zigner

Senior Member, Non-Attorney
He was fully aware of my intentions to continue to build and continue to compete. He was also fully aware that I didn't want to sign a 2 year contract if he was not going to continue to train me for that duration. In a text I found I specifically stated "I don't want to be stuck in a 2 year contract if you are going to have any difficulties training me for my competitions at ABC Gym (not real gym name). I have no problem joining other than that" and his response was "No worries, MJ (my initials), I am in it for the long haul, everything has been taken care of on my end. Go ahead and join"
The other problem you have is that YOU chose to cancel your contract. You still had full use of the gym.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top