Recent content by ESchultz9

How is this relevant?

Yes. Everything must conform to the MUTCD. This supports my line of defense.

This is not a legal argument. I'm looking for case law that establishes anything contrary (or in support of) my line of defense.

Working on getting this information.

title 23, United States Code, Section 109(d) and Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 655.603

Does anything in NY contradict the requirement by the MUTCD to have a valid survey? Also I repeat from the NY State Supplement to the MUTCD: Traffic control devices installed on such facilities within the State of New York are required to conform to the MUTCD, published by the Federal Highway...

The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) is incorporated by reference in 23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 655, Subpart F and shall be recognized as the national standard for all traffic control devices installed on any street, highway, bikeway, or private road open to...

NEW YORK STATE SUPPLEMENT INTRODUCTION The intent of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (MUTCD) is to enhance highway safety and operation by requiring uniform, understandable, and effective traffic control devices on facilities open to public travel. Traffic...

Yes. 78 in a 50 on Grand Central EB. By the (short) time I pulled over I was in Nassau (northern state) where the limit is 55. The portion of road is slightly downhill.

https://www.dot.ny.gov/mutcd Section 1A.07, “23 CFR 655.603 also states that traffic control devices on all streets, highways, bikeways, and private roads open to public travel in each State shall be in substantial conformance with standards issued or endorsed by the Federal Highway...

FlyingRon, can you please cite the statutes you mention?

New York (NYC/Queens) Hello, Is there any case law in NY relevant to the Speed Survey defense? I see a lot from CA but am struggling in NY. Thank you.